On 1/11/22 18:13, Hangyu Hua wrote:
I try to use ax25_release to trigger this bug like this:
ax25_release ax25_connect
lock_sock(sk);
-----------------------------sk = sock->sk;
-----------------------------ax25 = sk_to_ax25(sk);
ax25_destroy_socket(ax25);
release_sock(sk);
-----------------------------lock_sock(sk);
-----------------------------use ax25 again
But i failed beacause their have large speed difference. And i
don't have a physical device to test other function in ax25.
Anyway, i still think there will have a function to trigger this
race condition like ax25_destroy_timer. Beacause Any ohter
functions in ax25_proto_ops like ax25_bind protect ax25_sock by lock_sock(sk).
For a given sk pointer, sk_to_ax25(sk) is always returning the same value,
regardless of sk lock being held or not.
ax25_sk(sk)->cb is set only from ax25_create() or ax25_make_new()
ax25_connect can not be called until these operations have completed ?
Thanks.
On 2022/1/12 上午4:56, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On 1/10/22 20:20, Hangyu Hua wrote:
sk_to_ax25(sk) needs to be called after lock_sock(sk) to avoid UAF
caused by a race condition.
Can you describe what race condition you have found exactly ?
sk pointer can not change.
Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
index cfca99e295b8..c5d62420a2a8 100644
--- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
+++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ static int __must_check ax25_connect(struct socket *sock,
struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len, int flags)
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
- ax25_cb *ax25 = sk_to_ax25(sk), *ax25t;
+ ax25_cb *ax25, *ax25t;
struct full_sockaddr_ax25 *fsa = (struct full_sockaddr_ax25 *)uaddr;
ax25_digi *digi = NULL;
int ct = 0, err = 0;
@@ -1155,6 +1155,8 @@ static int __must_check ax25_connect(struct socket *sock,
lock_sock(sk);
+ ax25 = sk_to_ax25(sk);
+
/* deal with restarts */
if (sock->state == SS_CONNECTING) {
switch (sk->sk_state) {