Re: [PATCH net-next v6] net: phy: intel-xway: Add RGMII internal delay configuration

From: Martin Schiller
Date: Wed Jan 12 2022 - 06:18:13 EST

Next message: Jérôme Pouiller: "Re: [PATCH v9 08/24] wfx: add bus_sdio.c"
Previous message: Jeff Layton: "Re: [PATCH 4/5] uapi: always define F_GETLK64/F_SETLK64/F_SETLKW64 in fcntl.h"
In reply to: Tim Harvey: "Re: [PATCH net-next v6] net: phy: intel-xway: Add RGMII internal delay configuration"
Next in thread: Andrew Lunn: "Re: [PATCH net-next v6] net: phy: intel-xway: Add RGMII internal delay configuration"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2022-01-11 20:12, Tim Harvey wrote:

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:44 PM Martin Schiller <ms@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2022-01-11 00:12, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 2:07 AM Martin Schiller <ms@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> This adds the possibility to configure the RGMII RX/TX clock skew via
>> devicetree.
>>
>> Simply set phy mode to "rgmii-id", "rgmii-rxid" or "rgmii-txid" and
>> add
>> the "rx-internal-delay-ps" or "tx-internal-delay-ps" property to the
>> devicetree.
>>
>> Furthermore, a warning is now issued if the phy mode is configured to
>> "rgmii" and an internal delay is set in the phy (e.g. by
>> pin-strapping),
>> as in the dp83867 driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller <ms@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes to v5:
>> o remove #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_MDIO) check
>> o rename new function to xway_gphy_rgmii_init()
>>
>> Changes to v4:
>> o Fix Alignment to match open parenthesis
>>
>> Changes to v3:
>> o Fix typo in commit message
>> o use FIELD_PREP() and FIELD_GET() macros
>> o further code cleanups
>> o always mask rxskew AND txskew value in the register value
>>
>> Changes to v2:
>> o Fix missing whitespace in warning.
>>
>> Changes to v1:
>> o code cleanup and use phy_modify().
>> o use default of 2.0ns if delay property is absent instead of
>> returning
>> an error.
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/phy/intel-xway.c | 78
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/intel-xway.c
>> b/drivers/net/phy/intel-xway.c
>> index d453ec016168..fd7da2eeb963 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/intel-xway.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/intel-xway.c
>> @@ -8,11 +8,16 @@
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/phy.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>>
>> +#define XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL 0x17 /* mii control */
>> #define XWAY_MDIO_IMASK 0x19 /* interrupt
>> mask */
>> #define XWAY_MDIO_ISTAT 0x1A /* interrupt
>> status */
>> #define XWAY_MDIO_LED 0x1B /* led control */
>>
>> +#define XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL_RXSKEW_MASK GENMASK(14, 12)
>> +#define XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL_TXSKEW_MASK GENMASK(10, 8)
>> +
>> /* bit 15:12 are reserved */
>> #define XWAY_MDIO_LED_LED3_EN BIT(11) /* Enable the
>> integrated function of LED3 */
>> #define XWAY_MDIO_LED_LED2_EN BIT(10) /* Enable the
>> integrated function of LED2 */
>> @@ -157,6 +162,75 @@
>> #define PHY_ID_PHY11G_VR9_1_2 0xD565A409
>> #define PHY_ID_PHY22F_VR9_1_2 0xD565A419
>>
>> +static const int xway_internal_delay[] = {0, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000,
>> 2500,
>> + 3000, 3500};
>> +
>> +static int xway_gphy_rgmii_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &phydev->mdio.dev;
>> + unsigned int delay_size = ARRAY_SIZE(xway_internal_delay);
>> + s32 int_delay;
>> + int val = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!phy_interface_is_rgmii(phydev))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* Existing behavior was to use default pin strapping delay in
>> rgmii
>> + * mode, but rgmii should have meant no delay. Warn existing
>> users,
>> + * but do not change anything at the moment.
>> + */
>> + if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII) {
>> + u16 txskew, rxskew;
>> +
>> + val = phy_read(phydev, XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL);
>> + if (val < 0)
>> + return val;
>> +
>> + txskew = FIELD_GET(XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL_TXSKEW_MASK,
>> val);
>> + rxskew = FIELD_GET(XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL_RXSKEW_MASK,
>> val);
>> +
>> + if (txskew > 0 || rxskew > 0)
>> + phydev_warn(phydev,
>> + "PHY has delays (e.g. via pin
>> strapping), but phy-mode = 'rgmii'\n"
>> + "Should be 'rgmii-id' to use
>> internal delays txskew:%d ps rxskew:%d ps\n",
>> + xway_internal_delay[txskew],
>> + xway_internal_delay[rxskew]);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID ||
>> + phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID) {
>> + int_delay = phy_get_internal_delay(phydev, dev,
>> +
>> xway_internal_delay,
>> + delay_size, true);
>> +
>> + if (int_delay < 0) {
>> + phydev_warn(phydev, "rx-internal-delay-ps is
>> missing, use default of 2.0 ns\n");
>> + int_delay = 4; /* 2000 ps */
>> + }
>> +
>> + val |= FIELD_PREP(XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL_RXSKEW_MASK,
>> int_delay);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID ||
>> + phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID) {
>> + int_delay = phy_get_internal_delay(phydev, dev,
>> +
>> xway_internal_delay,
>> + delay_size, false);
>> +
>> + if (int_delay < 0) {
>> + phydev_warn(phydev, "tx-internal-delay-ps is
>> missing, use default of 2.0 ns\n");
>> + int_delay = 4; /* 2000 ps */
>> + }
>> +
>> + val |= FIELD_PREP(XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL_TXSKEW_MASK,
>> int_delay);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return phy_modify(phydev, XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL,
>> + XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL_RXSKEW_MASK |
>> + XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL_TXSKEW_MASK, val);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int xway_gphy_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> {
>> int err;
>> @@ -204,6 +278,10 @@ static int xway_gphy_config_init(struct
>> phy_device *phydev)
>> phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, XWAY_MMD_LED2H, ledxh);
>> phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, XWAY_MMD_LED2L, ledxl);
>>
>> + err = xway_gphy_rgmii_init(phydev);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
>
> Martin,
>
> I've got some boards with the GPY111 phy on them and I'm finding that
> modifying XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL to change the skew has no effect unless I
> do a soft reset (BCMR_RESET) first. I don't see anything in the
> datasheet which specifies this to be the case so I'm interested it
> what you have found. Are you sure adjusting the skews like this
> without a soft (or hard pin based) reset actually works?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tim

Hello Tim,

yes, you are right. It is not applied immediately. The link needs to be
toggled to get this settings active. But my experience shows that this
would be done in the further boot process anyway e.g. by restarting the
autonegotiation etc.

Martin,

I added a debug statement in xway_gphy_rgmii_init and here you can see
it gets called 'before' the link comes up from the NIC on a board that
has a cable plugged in at power-on. I can tell from testing that the
rx_delay/tx_delay set in xway_gphy_rgmii_init does not actually take
effect unless I then bring the link down and up again manually as you
indicate.

# dmesg | egrep "xway|nicvf"
[ 6.855971] xway_gphy_rgmii_init mdio_thunder MDI_MIICTRL:0xb100
rx_delay=1500 tx_delay=500
[ 6.999651] nicvf, ver 1.0
[ 7.002478] nicvf 0000:05:00.1: Adding to iommu group 7
[ 7.007785] nicvf 0000:05:00.1: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
[ 7.053189] nicvf 0000:05:00.2: Adding to iommu group 8
[ 7.058511] nicvf 0000:05:00.2: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
[ 11.044616] nicvf 0000:05:00.2 eth1: Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full duplex

If I add a 'genphy_soft_reset(phydev);' at the top of
xway_gphy_rgmii_init before the write to XWAY_MDIO_MIICTRL the values
do take effect so perhaps that's the proper fix.

OK, I see that we have to change something here.
But I would like to avoid a complete reset (BMCR_RESET) if possible.
How about this:
Before configuring the skews set BMCR_PDOWN using genphy_suspend(phydev)
and when we are done let's call genphy_resume(phydev).

I'm not fond of even using this phy driver either as it blatantly
forces LED configuration which may not agree with what boot firmware
does. I've noticed phy drivers starting to configure LED behavior more
and more but it seems like there should be dt bindings for that or
maybe an option to preserve the configuration that is set from boot
firmware.

There is already an approach which is used in openwrt [1] and which
Hauke tried to get into the kernel [2].

Interesting would be also a solution like this approach here [3].

But this is rather off-topic now.

[1] https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/lantiq/patches-5.10/0023-NET-PHY-add-led-support-for-intel-xway.patch;h=fb8d97511066bd7e20f8cd298401e81f74e02ae9;hb=d337731f85c880acc96e8a6b99b62aeb57b8253f
[2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg129574.html
[3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-leds/msg17241.html

Next message: Jérôme Pouiller: "Re: [PATCH v9 08/24] wfx: add bus_sdio.c"
Previous message: Jeff Layton: "Re: [PATCH 4/5] uapi: always define F_GETLK64/F_SETLK64/F_SETLKW64 in fcntl.h"
In reply to: Tim Harvey: "Re: [PATCH net-next v6] net: phy: intel-xway: Add RGMII internal delay configuration"
Next in thread: Andrew Lunn: "Re: [PATCH net-next v6] net: phy: intel-xway: Add RGMII internal delay configuration"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]