Re: [RFC 15/16] sched/fair: Account kthread runtime debt for CFS bandwidth

[Daniel Jordan]

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 04:08:57PM -0500, Daniel Jordan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:18:16AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > If we're gonna do this, let's please do it right and make weight based
> > control work too. Otherwise, its usefulness is pretty limited.
> 
> Ok, understood.
> 
> Doing it as presented is an incremental step and all that's required for
> this.  I figured weight could be added later with the first user that
> actually needs it.
> 
> I did prototype weight too, though, just to see if it was all gonna work
> together, so given how the discussion elsewhere in the thread is going,
> I might respin the scheduler part of this with another use case and
> weight-based control included.
> 
> I got this far, do the interface and CFS skeleton seem sane?  Both are

s/CFS/CFS bandwidth/

> basically unchanged with weight-based control included, the weight parts
> are just more code on top.
> 
> Thanks for looking.