Re: dw_hdmi is showing wrong colour after commit 7cd70656d1285b79("drm/bridge: display-connector: implement bus fmts callbacks")

From: Neil Armstrong
Date: Fri Jan 14 2022 - 05:42:42 EST


On 14/01/2022 09:29, Biju Das wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> + renesas-soc
>
>> Subject: Re: dw_hdmi is showing wrong colour after commit
>> 7cd70656d1285b79("drm/bridge: display-connector: implement bus fmts
>> callbacks")
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 13/01/2022 21:01, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> Hi Biju,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 2:45 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> RZ/G2{H, M, N} SoC has dw_hdmi IP and it was working ok(colour) till
>>>> the commit
>>>> 7cd70656d1285b79("drm/bridge: display-connector: implement bus fmts
>> callbacks").
>>>>
>>>> After this patch, the screen becomes greenish(may be it is setting it
>> into YUV format??).
>>>>
>>>> By checking the code, previously it used to call get_input_fmt callback
>> and set colour as RGB24.
>>>>
>>>> After this commit, it calls get_output_fmt_callbck and returns 3
>>>> outputformats(YUV16, YUV24 and RGB24) And get_input_fmt callback, I see
>> the outputformat as YUV16 instead of RGB24.
>>>>
>>>> Not sure, I am the only one seeing this issue with dw_HDMI driver.
>>
>> This patch was introduced to maintain the bridge color format negotiation
>> after using DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR, but it seems it behaves
>> incorrectly if the first bridge doesn't implement the negotiation
>> callbacks.
>>
>> Let me check the code to see how to fix that.
>
> Thanks for the information, I am happy to test the patch/fix.
>
> Cheers,
> Biju
>
>>
>>>
>>> I have tested linux-next 20220112 on a imx6q-sabresd board, which shows:
>>>
>>> dwhdmi-imx 120000.hdmi: Detected HDMI TX controller v1.30a with HDCP
>>> (DWC HDMI 3D TX PHY)
>>>
>>> The colors are shown correctly here.
>>>
>>
>> The imx doesn't use DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR so the negotiation
>> fails and use the RGB fallback input & output format.
>>
>> Anyway thanks for testing
>>
>> Neil

Can you test :

==><===============================
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
index c96847fc0ebc..7019acd37716 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
@@ -955,7 +955,14 @@ drm_atomic_bridge_chain_select_bus_fmts(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
last_bridge_state = drm_atomic_get_new_bridge_state(crtc_state->state,
last_bridge);

- if (last_bridge->funcs->atomic_get_output_bus_fmts) {
+ /*
+ * Only negociate with real values if both end of the bridge chain
+ * support negociation callbacks, otherwise you can end in a situation
+ * where the selected output format doesn't match with the first bridge
+ * output format.
+ */
+ if (bridge->funcs->atomic_get_input_bus_fmts &&
+ last_bridge->funcs->atomic_get_output_bus_fmts) {
const struct drm_bridge_funcs *funcs = last_bridge->funcs;

/*
@@ -980,7 +987,12 @@ drm_atomic_bridge_chain_select_bus_fmts(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
if (!out_bus_fmts)
return -ENOMEM;

- if (conn->display_info.num_bus_formats &&
+ /*
+ * If first bridge doesn't support negociation, use MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED
+ * as a safe value for the whole bridge chain
+ */
+ if (bridge->funcs->atomic_get_input_bus_fmts &&
+ conn->display_info.num_bus_formats &&
conn->display_info.bus_formats)
out_bus_fmts[0] = conn->display_info.bus_formats[0];
else
==><===============================

This should exclude your situation where the first bridge doesn't support negociation.

Neil