Re: [PATCH] clk: gate: Add some kunit test suites

From: Daniel Latypov
Date: Sat Jan 15 2022 - 16:49:03 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "[mingo-tip:sched/headers 1597/2384] ./usr/include/linux/netlink.h:5:10: fatal error: 'uapi/linux/types.h' file not found"
Previous message: Sebastian Krzyszkowiak: "Re: [PATCH] thermal: qoriq: Only enable sites that actually exist"
In reply to: Stephen Boyd: "[PATCH] clk: gate: Add some kunit test suites"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 12:07 AM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Test various parts of the clk gate implementation with the kunit testing
> framework.
>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>

Nice!
Some minor nits and suggestions re kunit usage below.

Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>
> This is a resend of the RFC[1] from almost two years ago! It will be
> merged after the merge window closes.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200408035637.110858-1-sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> drivers/clk/Kconfig | 8 +
> drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/clk-gate-test.c | 481 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 490 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-gate-test.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> index c5b3dc97396a..41e560249370 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> @@ -421,4 +421,12 @@ source "drivers/clk/x86/Kconfig"
> source "drivers/clk/xilinx/Kconfig"
> source "drivers/clk/zynqmp/Kconfig"
>
> +# Kunit test cases
> +config CLK_GATE_TEST
> + tristate "Basic gate type Kunit test"
> + depends on KUNIT
> + default KUNIT
> + help
> + Kunit test for the basic clk gate type.

minor nit: since the previous version, there is now
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/style.html#test-kconfig-entries

so something like:
config CLK_GATE_KUNIT_TEST
tristate "Basic gate type KUnit test" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
depends on KUNIT
default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
...

would be the way to go.

On a related note, you could add a .kunitconfig file to make running
this easier:
$ cat drivers/clk/.kunitconfig
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_COMMON_CLK=y
CONFIG_CLK_GATE_TEST=y

$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=drivers/clk
...
Testing complete. Passed: 17, Failed: 0, Crashed: 0, Skipped: 0, Errors: 0

There's not much in the way of dependencies here so it doesn't help that much.
But it is an option if you want a one-liner way to be able to run the test.

> +
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Makefile b/drivers/clk/Makefile
> index e42312121e51..dcdb75712940 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/Makefile
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) += clk-divider.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) += clk-fixed-factor.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) += clk-fixed-rate.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) += clk-gate.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_GATE_TEST) += clk-gate-test.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) += clk-multiplier.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) += clk-mux.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK) += clk-composite.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-gate-test.c b/drivers/clk/clk-gate-test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b499c2ffa815
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-gate-test.c

again a minor nit: clk_gate_test.c or clk_gate_kunit.c would be the
preferred names now:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/style.html#test-kconfig-entries

Note that KUnit itself doesn't follow its own naming guidelines unfortunately.

> @@ -0,0 +1,481 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Kunit test for clk gate basic type
> + */
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +static void clk_gate_register_test_dev(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *ret;
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> +
> + pdev = platform_device_register_simple("test_gate_device", -1, NULL, 0);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
> +
> + ret = clk_hw_register_gate(&pdev->dev, "test_gate", NULL, 0, NULL,
> + 0, 0, NULL);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ret);

I think we want ASSERT here, otherwise we segfault below.

> + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "test_gate", clk_hw_get_name(ret));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0UL, clk_hw_get_flags(ret));
> +
> + clk_hw_unregister_gate(ret);
> + platform_device_put(pdev);
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_register_test_parent_names(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *parent;
> + struct clk_hw *ret;
> +
> + parent = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "test_parent", NULL, 0,
> + 1000000);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
> +
> + ret = clk_hw_register_gate(NULL, "test_gate", "test_parent", 0, NULL,
> + 0, 0, NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ret);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, parent, clk_hw_get_parent(ret));
> +
> + clk_hw_unregister_gate(ret);
> + clk_hw_unregister_fixed_rate(parent);
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_register_test_parent_data(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *parent;
> + struct clk_hw *ret;
> + struct clk_parent_data pdata = { };
> +
> + parent = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "test_parent", NULL, 0,
> + 1000000);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
> + pdata.hw = parent;
> +
> + ret = clk_hw_register_gate_parent_data(NULL, "test_gate", &pdata, 0,
> + NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ret);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, parent, clk_hw_get_parent(ret));
> +
> + clk_hw_unregister_gate(ret);
> + clk_hw_unregister_fixed_rate(parent);
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_register_test_parent_data_legacy(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *parent;
> + struct clk_hw *ret;
> + struct clk_parent_data pdata = { };
> +
> + parent = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "test_parent", NULL, 0,
> + 1000000);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
> + pdata.name = "test_parent";
> +
> + ret = clk_hw_register_gate_parent_data(NULL, "test_gate", &pdata, 0,
> + NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ret);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, parent, clk_hw_get_parent(ret));
> +
> + clk_hw_unregister_gate(ret);
> + clk_hw_unregister_fixed_rate(parent);
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_register_test_parent_hw(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *parent;
> + struct clk_hw *ret;
> +
> + parent = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "test_parent", NULL, 0,
> + 1000000);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
> +
> + ret = clk_hw_register_gate_parent_hw(NULL, "test_gate", parent, 0, NULL,
> + 0, 0, NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ret);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, parent, clk_hw_get_parent(ret));
> +
> + clk_hw_unregister_gate(ret);
> + clk_hw_unregister_fixed_rate(parent);
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_register_test_hiword_invalid(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *ret;
> +
> + ret = clk_hw_register_gate(NULL, "test_gate", NULL, 0, NULL,
> + 20, CLK_GATE_HIWORD_MASK, NULL);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, IS_ERR(ret));
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case clk_gate_register_test_cases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_register_test_dev),
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_register_test_parent_names),
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_register_test_parent_data),
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_register_test_parent_data_legacy),
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_register_test_parent_hw),
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_register_test_hiword_invalid),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite clk_gate_register_test_suite = {
> + .name = "clk-gate-register-test",
> + .test_cases = clk_gate_register_test_cases,
> +};
> +
> +struct clk_gate_test_context {
> + void __iomem *fake_mem;
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> + struct clk_hw *parent;
> + u32 fake_reg; /* Keep at end, KASAN can detect out of bounds */
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_gate_test_context *clk_gate_test_alloc_ctx(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx;
> +
> + test->priv = ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);

It looks like kunit_kzalloc() here would work as well.
It should also be a bit safer, i.e. we won't leak ctx if
clk_hw_register_fixed_rate() errors out in the init func.

> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
> + ctx->fake_mem = (void __force __iomem *)&ctx->fake_reg;
> +
> + return ctx;
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_test_parent_rate(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> + struct clk_hw *parent = ctx->parent;
> + struct clk_hw *hw = ctx->hw;
> + unsigned long prate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
> + unsigned long rate = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, prate, rate);
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_test_enable(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> + struct clk_hw *parent = ctx->parent;
> + struct clk_hw *hw = ctx->hw;
> + struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
> + int ret;
> + u32 enable_val = BIT(5);
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);

optional: in the cases where it's short enough, I'd personally favor
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, clk_prepare_enable(clk), 0);

That way we get more context in the assertion failure messages.

> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, enable_val, ctx->fake_reg);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(hw));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(hw));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(parent));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(parent));
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_test_disable(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> + struct clk_hw *parent = ctx->parent;
> + struct clk_hw *hw = ctx->hw;
> + struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
> + int ret;
> + u32 enable_val = BIT(5);
> + u32 disable_val = 0;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, enable_val, ctx->fake_reg);
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, disable_val, ctx->fake_reg);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(hw));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(hw));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(parent));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(parent));
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case clk_gate_test_cases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_test_parent_rate),
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_test_enable),
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_test_disable),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static int clk_gate_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *parent;
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx;
> +
> + ctx = clk_gate_test_alloc_ctx(test);
> + parent = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "test_parent", NULL, 0,
> + 2000000);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
> +
> + hw = clk_hw_register_gate_parent_hw(NULL, "test_gate", parent, 0,
> + ctx->fake_mem, 5, 0, NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw);
> +
> + ctx->hw = hw;
> + ctx->parent = parent;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> +
> + clk_hw_unregister_gate(ctx->hw);
> + clk_hw_unregister_fixed_rate(ctx->parent);
> + kfree(ctx);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite clk_gate_test_suite = {
> + .name = "clk-gate-test",
> + .init = clk_gate_test_init,
> + .exit = clk_gate_test_exit,
> + .test_cases = clk_gate_test_cases,
> +};
> +
> +static void clk_gate_test_invert_enable(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> + struct clk_hw *parent = ctx->parent;
> + struct clk_hw *hw = ctx->hw;
> + struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
> + int ret;
> + u32 enable_val = 0;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, enable_val, ctx->fake_reg);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(hw));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(hw));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(parent));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(parent));
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_test_invert_disable(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> + struct clk_hw *parent = ctx->parent;
> + struct clk_hw *hw = ctx->hw;
> + struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
> + int ret;
> + u32 enable_val = 0;
> + u32 disable_val = BIT(15);
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, enable_val, ctx->fake_reg);
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, disable_val, ctx->fake_reg);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(hw));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(hw));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(parent));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(parent));
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case clk_gate_test_invert_cases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_test_invert_enable),
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_test_invert_disable),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static int clk_gate_test_invert_init(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *parent;
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx;
> +
> + ctx = clk_gate_test_alloc_ctx(test);
> + parent = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "test_parent", NULL, 0,
> + 2000000);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
> +
> + ctx->fake_reg = BIT(15); /* Default to off */
> + hw = clk_hw_register_gate_parent_hw(NULL, "test_gate", parent, 0,
> + ctx->fake_mem, 15,
> + CLK_GATE_SET_TO_DISABLE, NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw);
> +
> + ctx->hw = hw;
> + ctx->parent = parent;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite clk_gate_test_invert_suite = {
> + .name = "clk-gate-invert-test",
> + .init = clk_gate_test_invert_init,
> + .exit = clk_gate_test_exit,
> + .test_cases = clk_gate_test_invert_cases,
> +};
> +
> +static void clk_gate_test_hiword_enable(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> + struct clk_hw *parent = ctx->parent;
> + struct clk_hw *hw = ctx->hw;
> + struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
> + int ret;
> + u32 enable_val = BIT(9) | BIT(9 + 16);
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, enable_val, ctx->fake_reg);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(hw));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(hw));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(parent));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(parent));
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_test_hiword_disable(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
> + struct clk_hw *parent = ctx->parent;
> + struct clk_hw *hw = ctx->hw;
> + struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
> + int ret;
> + u32 enable_val = BIT(9) | BIT(9 + 16);
> + u32 disable_val = BIT(9 + 16);
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, enable_val, ctx->fake_reg);
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, disable_val, ctx->fake_reg);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(hw));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(hw));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(parent));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(parent));
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case clk_gate_test_hiword_cases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_test_hiword_enable),
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_test_hiword_disable),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static int clk_gate_test_hiword_init(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *parent;
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx;
> +
> + ctx = clk_gate_test_alloc_ctx(test);
> + parent = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "test_parent", NULL, 0,
> + 2000000);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent);
> +
> + hw = clk_hw_register_gate_parent_hw(NULL, "test_gate", parent, 0,
> + ctx->fake_mem, 9,
> + CLK_GATE_HIWORD_MASK, NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw);
> +
> + ctx->hw = hw;
> + ctx->parent = parent;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite clk_gate_test_hiword_suite = {
> + .name = "clk-gate-hiword-test",
> + .init = clk_gate_test_hiword_init,
> + .exit = clk_gate_test_exit,
> + .test_cases = clk_gate_test_hiword_cases,
> +};
> +
> +static void clk_gate_test_is_enabled(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx;
> +
> + ctx = clk_gate_test_alloc_ctx(test);
> + ctx->fake_reg = BIT(7);
> + hw = clk_hw_register_gate(NULL, "test_gate", NULL, 0, ctx->fake_mem, 7,
> + 0, NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(hw));
> +
> + clk_hw_unregister_gate(hw);
> + kfree(ctx);
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_test_is_disabled(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx;
> +
> + ctx = clk_gate_test_alloc_ctx(test);
> + ctx->fake_reg = BIT(4);
> + hw = clk_hw_register_gate(NULL, "test_gate", NULL, 0, ctx->fake_mem, 7,
> + 0, NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(hw));
> +
> + clk_hw_unregister_gate(hw);
> + kfree(ctx);
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_test_is_enabled_inverted(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx;
> +
> + ctx = clk_gate_test_alloc_ctx(test);
> + ctx->fake_reg = BIT(31);
> + hw = clk_hw_register_gate(NULL, "test_gate", NULL, 0, ctx->fake_mem, 2,
> + CLK_GATE_SET_TO_DISABLE, NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(hw));
> +
> + clk_hw_unregister_gate(hw);
> + kfree(ctx);
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_gate_test_is_disabled_inverted(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> + struct clk_gate_test_context *ctx;
> +
> + ctx = clk_gate_test_alloc_ctx(test);
> + ctx->fake_reg = BIT(29);
> + hw = clk_hw_register_gate(NULL, "test_gate", NULL, 0, ctx->fake_mem, 29,
> + CLK_GATE_SET_TO_DISABLE, NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, clk_hw_is_enabled(hw));
> +
> + clk_hw_unregister_gate(hw);
> + kfree(ctx);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case clk_gate_test_enabled_cases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_test_is_enabled),
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_test_is_disabled),
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_test_is_enabled_inverted),
> + KUNIT_CASE(clk_gate_test_is_disabled_inverted),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite clk_gate_test_enabled_suite = {
> + .name = "clk-gate-is_enabled-test",
> + .test_cases = clk_gate_test_enabled_cases,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suites(
> + &clk_gate_register_test_suite,
> + &clk_gate_test_suite,
> + &clk_gate_test_invert_suite,
> + &clk_gate_test_hiword_suite,
> + &clk_gate_test_enabled_suite
> +);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sboyd/spmi.git
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/20220115080657.2780989-1-sboyd%40kernel.org.

Next message: kernel test robot: "[mingo-tip:sched/headers 1597/2384] ./usr/include/linux/netlink.h:5:10: fatal error: 'uapi/linux/types.h' file not found"
Previous message: Sebastian Krzyszkowiak: "Re: [PATCH] thermal: qoriq: Only enable sites that actually exist"
In reply to: Stephen Boyd: "[PATCH] clk: gate: Add some kunit test suites"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]