Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the risc-v tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 11:40:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   b579dfe71a6a ("RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available")
> 
> from the risc-v tree and commit:
> 
>   c62a76859723 ("RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI v0.2 base extension")
> 
> from the kvm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> 
> diff --cc arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> index 289621da4a2a,9c46dd3ff4a2..000000000000
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> @@@ -27,7 -27,14 +27,15 @@@ enum sbi_ext_id 
>   	SBI_EXT_IPI = 0x735049,
>   	SBI_EXT_RFENCE = 0x52464E43,
>   	SBI_EXT_HSM = 0x48534D,
>  +	SBI_EXT_SRST = 0x53525354,
> + 
> + 	/* Experimentals extensions must lie within this range */
> + 	SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_START = 0x08000000,
> + 	SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_END = 0x08FFFFFF,
> + 
> + 	/* Vendor extensions must lie within this range */
> + 	SBI_EXT_VENDOR_START = 0x09000000,
> + 	SBI_EXT_VENDOR_END = 0x09FFFFFF,
>   };
>   
>   enum sbi_ext_base_fid {

This is now a conflict between the risc-v tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpnMtMVX0Oll.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature