Re: [PATCH 20/23] dt-bindings: iio: adc: exynos-adc: Add ADC-V3 variant

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:32:12 +0100
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 13/01/2022 13:11, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> > This patch adds a new compatible string for exynos's ADC-V3 variant.
> > 
> > Cc: linux-fsd@xxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Tamseel Shams <m.shams@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Please cc linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for next version...

> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml          | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml
> > index 81c87295912c..9303053759ca 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/samsung,exynos-adc.yaml
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties:
> >      enum:
> >        - samsung,exynos-adc-v1                 # Exynos5250
> >        - samsung,exynos-adc-v2
> > +      - samsung,exynos-adc-v3  
> 
> Please use SoC-specific compatible. IP block versions are tricky because:
> 1. Documentation/datasheet mentioning which SoC has which block version
> are not public.
> 2. Neither are public the datasheets for ADC blocks.
> 3. The versioning of IP blocks can be inaccurate.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel