On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:56:04 +0100,Yes, we will do that.
Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 1/14/22 18:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:19 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:07:28 +0100,
>>> Lucas Tanure wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with
>>>> multiple instances of CS35L41 connected by I2C to
>>>> the main CPU.
>>>>
>>>> We add an ID to the i2c_multi_instantiate_idsi list
>>>> to enumerate all I2C slaves correctly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> I think it's better to merge this from sound git tree together with
>>> others in the patch set, presumably for rc1.
>>>
>>> It'd be great if ACPI people can take a review and give an ack/nack.
>>
>> Hans, what do you think?
>
> This patch (5/5) applies on top of:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20211210154050.3713-1-sbinding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Which still needs some work and which really should be merged
> through the ACPI tree. IMHO it would be best to simply drop
> this (5/5) from this series and move it to the v3 of the
> series which I've linked to above.
>
> 1-4 can be merged through the alsa tree independently of 5/5 AFAIK.
OK, that's fine.
Lucas, could you submit v3 patches in the suggested way?
thanks,
Takashi