Re: arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c:171:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'nmi_cpu_backtrace'
From: Mark Rutland
Date: Mon Jan 17 2022 - 08:58:46 EST
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:37:41AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 06:13:37AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > head: fb3b0673b7d5b477ed104949450cd511337ba3c6
> > commit: 1614b2b11fab29dd4ff31ebba9d266961f5af69e arch: Make ARCH_STACKWALK independent of STACKTRACE
> > date: 5 weeks ago
> > config: powerpc64-randconfig-r025-20220113 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220114/202201140631.ZuSwa9QF-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
> > compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=1614b2b11fab29dd4ff31ebba9d266961f5af69e
> > git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > git fetch --no-tags linus master
> > git checkout 1614b2b11fab29dd4ff31ebba9d266961f5af69e
> > # save the config file to linux build tree
> > mkdir build_dir
> > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=powerpc SHELL=/bin/bash
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c: In function 'handle_backtrace_ipi':
> > >> arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c:171:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'nmi_cpu_backtrace' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 171 | nmi_cpu_backtrace(regs);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c: At top level:
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c:224:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > 224 | void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, bool exclude_self)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c: In function 'arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace':
> > >> arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c:226:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace'; did you mean 'arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 226 | nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(mask, exclude_self, raise_backtrace_ipi);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> I suppose this ought to cure things...
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index a2443d61728e..bde1aaedeb72 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ int __no_sanitize_address arch_stack_walk_reliable(stack_trace_consume_fn consum
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) && defined(CONFIG_NMI_IPI)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) && defined(CONFIG_NMI_IPI) && defined(CONFIG_STACKTRACE)
> static void handle_backtrace_ipi(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> nmi_cpu_backtrace(regs);
Hmm...
In include/linux/nmi.h we have:
| #ifdef arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace
| ...
| bool nmi_cpu_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs);
| #else
| ...
| #endif
... and in lib/nmi_backtrace.c we have:
| #ifdef arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace
| ...
| bool nmi_cpu_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs)
| {
| ...
| }
| ...
| #endif
In arch/powerpc/include/asm/nmi.h we have:
| #if defined(CONFIG_NMI_IPI) && defined(CONFIG_STACKTRACE)
| extern void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask,
| bool exclude_self);
| #define arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace
| #endif
Either it's sufficient to check only CONFIG_NMI_IPI &&
CONFIG_STACKTRACE, or there's a latent bug when CONFIG_NMI_IPI &&
CONFIG_STACKTRACE && !CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64.
For consistency with teh other ifedeffery I reckon this should be:
| #if defined(CONFIG_NMI_IPI) && defined(CONFIG_STACKTRACE)
... and we need to adjust the comment for hte #endif, too.
Otherwise, this makes sense to me -- did you plan to send this as a
patch, or did you want someone else to spin one?
Thanks,
Mark.