Re: [PATCH v4 18/66] xen: Use vma_lookup() in privcmd_ioctl_mmap()
From: Liam Howlett
Date: Mon Jan 17 2022 - 19:02:24 EST
* Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> [220112 11:01]:
> On 12/1/21 15:29, Liam Howlett wrote:
> > From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > vma_lookup() walks the VMA tree for a specific value, find_vma() will
> > search the tree after walking to a specific value. It is more efficient
> > to only walk to the requested value as this case requires the address to
> > equal the vm_start.
>
> By that you mean the privcmd_ioctl_mmap() code checks msg->va !=
> vma->vm_start and thus we know it's never interested the next vma, that
> find_vma() can return if no vma covers the address?
Yes. I will reword the commit message.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/xen/privcmd.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
> > index 3369734108af..ad17166b0ef6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
> > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static long privcmd_ioctl_mmap(struct file *file, void __user *udata)
> > struct page, lru);
> > struct privcmd_mmap_entry *msg = page_address(page);
> >
> > - vma = find_vma(mm, msg->va);
> > + vma = vma_lookup(mm, msg->va);
> > rc = -EINVAL;
> >
> > if (!vma || (msg->va != vma->vm_start) || vma->vm_private_data)
>