[tip: perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add static_branch for LBR INFO flags
From: tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Date: Tue Jan 18 2022 - 06:17:57 EST
The following commit has been merged into the perf/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 6b19788ddc5937831ffd27525a1b793953fd2d2b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/6b19788ddc5937831ffd27525a1b793953fd2d2b
Author: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 08:51:17 -08:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:09:49 +01:00
perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add static_branch for LBR INFO flags
Using static_branch to replace the LBR INFO flags to optimize the LBR
INFO parsing.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1641315077-96661-2-git-send-email-peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index b7228a1..f8fd255 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -893,37 +893,40 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
cpuc->lbr_stack.hw_idx = tos;
}
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(x86_lbr_mispred);
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(x86_lbr_cycles);
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(x86_lbr_type);
+
static __always_inline int get_lbr_br_type(u64 info)
{
- if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) || !x86_pmu.lbr_br_type)
- return 0;
+ int type = 0;
- return (info & LBR_INFO_BR_TYPE) >> LBR_INFO_BR_TYPE_OFFSET;
+ if (static_branch_likely(&x86_lbr_type))
+ type = (info & LBR_INFO_BR_TYPE) >> LBR_INFO_BR_TYPE_OFFSET;
+
+ return type;
}
static __always_inline bool get_lbr_mispred(u64 info)
{
- if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) && !x86_pmu.lbr_mispred)
- return 0;
+ bool mispred = 0;
- return !!(info & LBR_INFO_MISPRED);
-}
-
-static __always_inline bool get_lbr_predicted(u64 info)
-{
- if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) && !x86_pmu.lbr_mispred)
- return 0;
+ if (static_branch_likely(&x86_lbr_mispred))
+ mispred = !!(info & LBR_INFO_MISPRED);
- return !(info & LBR_INFO_MISPRED);
+ return mispred;
}
static __always_inline u16 get_lbr_cycles(u64 info)
{
+ u16 cycles = info & LBR_INFO_CYCLES;
+
if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) &&
- !(x86_pmu.lbr_timed_lbr && info & LBR_INFO_CYC_CNT_VALID))
- return 0;
+ (!static_branch_likely(&x86_lbr_cycles) ||
+ !(info & LBR_INFO_CYC_CNT_VALID)))
+ cycles = 0;
- return info & LBR_INFO_CYCLES;
+ return cycles;
}
static void intel_pmu_store_lbr(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
@@ -951,7 +954,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_store_lbr(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
e->from = from;
e->to = to;
e->mispred = get_lbr_mispred(info);
- e->predicted = get_lbr_predicted(info);
+ e->predicted = !e->mispred;
e->in_tx = !!(info & LBR_INFO_IN_TX);
e->abort = !!(info & LBR_INFO_ABORT);
e->cycles = get_lbr_cycles(info);
@@ -1718,6 +1721,14 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init(void)
x86_pmu.lbr_to_cycles = 1;
break;
}
+
+ if (x86_pmu.lbr_has_info) {
+ /*
+ * Only used in combination with baseline pebs.
+ */
+ static_branch_enable(&x86_lbr_mispred);
+ static_branch_enable(&x86_lbr_cycles);
+ }
}
/*
@@ -1779,6 +1790,12 @@ void __init intel_pmu_arch_lbr_init(void)
x86_pmu.lbr_br_type = ecx.split.lbr_br_type;
x86_pmu.lbr_nr = lbr_nr;
+ if (x86_pmu.lbr_mispred)
+ static_branch_enable(&x86_lbr_mispred);
+ if (x86_pmu.lbr_timed_lbr)
+ static_branch_enable(&x86_lbr_cycles);
+ if (x86_pmu.lbr_br_type)
+ static_branch_enable(&x86_lbr_type);
arch_lbr_xsave = is_arch_lbr_xsave_available();
if (arch_lbr_xsave) {