Re: [PATCH 0/5] kvm: fix latent guest entry/exit bugs

[Christian Borntraeger]

Am 18.01.22 um 13:02 schrieb Mark Rutland:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 06:45:36PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 1/14/22 16:19, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > I also think there is another issue here. When an IRQ is taken from SIE, will
> > > user_mode(regs) always be false, or could it be true if the guest userspace is
> > > running? If it can be true I think tha context tracking checks can complain,
> > > and it*might*  be possible to trigger a panic().
> >
> > I think that it would be false, because the guest PSW is in the SIE block
> > and switched on SIE entry and exit, but I might be incorrect.
>
> Ah; that's the crux of my confusion: I had thought the guest PSW would
> be placed in the regular lowcore *_old_psw slots. From looking at the
> entry asm it looks like the host PSW (around the invocation of SIE) is
> stored there, since that's what the OUTSIDE + SIEEXIT handling is
> checking for.
>
> Assuming that's correct, I agree this problem doesn't exist, and there's
> only the common RCU/tracing/lockdep management to fix.

Will you provide an s390 patch in your next iteration or shall we then do
one as soon as there is a v2? We also need to look into vsie.c where we
also call sie64a