Am 20.01.22 um 13:03 schrieb Mark Rutland:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:28:09PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 1/19/22 20:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
I wonder, is the s390 guest entry/exit*preemptible* ?
If a timer IRQ can preempt in the middle of the EQS, we wouldn't balance
things before a ctx-switch to the idle thread, which would then be able
to hit this.
I'll need to go audit the other architectures for similar.
They don't enable interrupts in the entry/exit path so they should be okay.
True.
So it sounds like for s390 adding an explicit preempt_{disable,enable}() is the
right thing to do. I'll add that and explanatory commentary.
That would not be trivial I guess. We do allow (and need) page faults on sie for guest
demand paging and
this piece of arch/s390/mm/fault.c
case GMAP_FAULT:
if (faulthandler_disabled() || !mm)
goto out;
break;
}
would no longer work since faulthandler_disabled checks for the preempt count.