Re: [PATCH 1/1] coresight: Fix TRCCONFIGR.QE sysfs interface
From: Mike Leach
Date: Fri Jan 21 2022 - 07:41:12 EST
Hi James,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 11:37, James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19/01/2022 15:22, Mike Leach wrote:
> > Hi James
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 17:33, James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> It's impossible to program a valid value for TRCCONFIGR.QE
> >> when TRCIDR0.QSUPP==0b10. In that case the following is true:
> >>
> >> Q element support is implemented, and only supports Q elements without
> >> instruction counts. TRCCONFIGR.QE can only take the values 0b00 or 0b11.
> >>
> >> Currently the low bit of QSUPP is checked to see if the low bit of QE can
> >> be written to, but as you can see when QSUPP==0b10 the low bit is cleared
> >> making it impossible to ever write the only valid value of 0b11 to QE.
> >> 0b10 would be written instead, which is a reserved QE value even for all
> >> values of QSUPP.
> >>
> >> The fix is to allow writing the low bit of QE for any non zero value of
> >> QSUPP.
> >>
> >> This change doesn't go any further to validate if the user supplied value
> >> is valid, because none of the other parts this function do, but it does fix
> >> the case where it was impossible to ever set a valid value.
> >>
> >
> > I concur that the input is not checked as valid, However all the other
> > fields are single bit - with no invalid values - other than the cond
> > field, which controls tracing of non-branch conditionals -
> > architecturally unsupported for A profile in ETMv4/.
> >
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c
> >> index a0640fa5c55b..a99bb537ea23 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c
> >> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static ssize_t mode_store(struct device *dev,
> >> /* start by clearing QE bits */
> >> config->cfg &= ~(BIT(13) | BIT(14));
> >> /* if supported, Q elements with instruction counts are enabled */
> >> - if ((mode & BIT(0)) && (drvdata->q_support & BIT(0)))
> >> + if ((mode & BIT(0)) && drvdata->q_support)
> >> config->cfg |= BIT(13);
> >
> > This can be trivially changed to
> >
> > if ((mode) && drvdata->q_support)
> > config->cfg |= BIT(13);
> >
> > to ensure that any input mode 2'b01, 2'b10, 2'b11 results in output
> > settings of 2'b01, 2'b11, 2'b11 respectively
> >
> > With that
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
>
> Thanks for the review. Can I also get your opinion about this one? At the very least
> I think the comment is not detailed enough, but I also think that case 0 should set
> BIT(0) rather than BIT(1). Or is there some edge case and it's correct?
>
Agreed - case 0 should be BIT(0)
However, now you mention it there is a corner case too...
On an ETM4.3 or later, if TRCIDR4.NUMRSPAIR == 0, then
drvdata->nr_event == 0 means zero events, otherwise drvdata->nr_event
== 0 means 1 event as implemented in the code below.
So a check on drvdata->nr_resource (which is the processed NUMRSPAIR
value wrt etm arch ) to skip setting eventctrl1 if this is 0 could be
added.
Regards
Mike
Mike
>
> /* start by clearing all instruction event enable bits */
> config->eventctrl1 &= ~(BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2) | BIT(3));
> switch (drvdata->nr_event) {
> case 0x0:
> /* generate Event element for event 1 */
> config->eventctrl1 |= val & BIT(1);
> break;
> case 0x1:
> /* generate Event element for event 1 and 2 */
> config->eventctrl1 |= val & (BIT(0) | BIT(1));
> break;
> case 0x2:
> /* generate Event element for event 1, 2 and 3 */
> config->eventctrl1 |= val & (BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2));
> break;
> case 0x3:
> /* generate Event element for all 4 events */
> config->eventctrl1 |= val & 0xF;
> break;
> default:
> break;
> }
>
>
> >> /*
> >> * if supported, Q elements with and without instruction
> >> --
> >> 2.17.1
> >>
> >
> >
--
Mike Leach
Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd.
Manchester Design Centre. UK