RE: [PATCH v3 2/3] docs: firmware-guide: ACPI: Add named interrupt doc

[Akhil R]

> > Added details and example for named interrupts in the ACPI table.
> 
> Added details and example for --> Add a detailed example of the
> 
> ...
> 
> > +            Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveHigh, Exclusive) {
> > +                0x20,
> 
> I would think of splitting this to two separate entries in between of which the
> GpioInt() resource is provided. It will explicitly show that you describe the case
> only for Interrupt(). Something like
> 
>   Interrupt (...) { 0x20 }
>   GpioInt(...) { ... }
>   Interrupt (...) { 0x24 }
> 
> But it's up to you.
Instead, would it be good to add a statement mentioning this explicitly. Something 
like -

    The interrupt name 'default' will correspond to 0x20 in Interrupt()
    resource and 'alert' to 0x24. Note that only the Interrupt() resource
    is mapped and not GpioInt() or similar.

I feel mixing these in the example would add a bit of confusion to the reader.

Thanks,
Akhil