Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] mm: Don't skip swap entry even if zap_details specified

From: Peter Xu
Date: Mon Jan 24 2022 - 06:03:14 EST


On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:54:29PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> I have a quick idea on reproducer now (perhaps file size shrinking on private
> pages being swapped out), I'll try to write a real reproducer and update later.

Here's the reproducer..

===8<===
#define _GNU_SOURCE /* See feature_test_macros(7) */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/types.h>

int page_size;
int shmem_fd;
char *buffer;

void main(void)
{
int ret;
char val;

page_size = getpagesize();
shmem_fd = memfd_create("test", 0);
assert(shmem_fd >= 0);

ret = ftruncate(shmem_fd, page_size * 2);
assert(ret == 0);

buffer = mmap(NULL, page_size * 2, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE, shmem_fd, 0);
assert(buffer != MAP_FAILED);

/* Write private page, swap it out */
buffer[page_size] = 1;
madvise(buffer, page_size * 2, MADV_PAGEOUT);

/* This should drop private buffer[page_size] already */
ret = ftruncate(shmem_fd, page_size);
assert(ret == 0);
/* Recover the size */
ret = ftruncate(shmem_fd, page_size * 2);
assert(ret == 0);

/* Re-read the data, it should be all zero */
val = buffer[page_size];
if (val == 0)
printf("Good\n");
else
printf("BUG\n");
}
===8<===

I'm looking for a correct Fixes for the 1st patch, but afaict it seems not
right even in the initial git commit, which traces back to the "history" git
repo of your commit:

dd9fd0e03de6 ("[PATCH] rmap: nonlinear truncation", 2004-04-17)

Where we have:

/*
* If details->check_mapping, we leave swap entries;
* if details->nonlinear_vma, we leave file entries.
*/
if (unlikely(details))
continue;
if (!pte_file(ptent))
free_swap_and_cache(pte_to_swp_entry(ptent));

As I don't know how it could be right if the user only specified
details->nonlinear_vma but keeping details->check_mapping==NULL.. there, and
there're definitely callers for that, e.g.:

static long madvise_dontneed(struct vm_area_struct * vma,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) || is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
return -EINVAL;

if (unlikely(vma->vm_flags & VM_NONLINEAR)) {
struct zap_details details = {
.nonlinear_vma = vma,
.last_index = ULONG_MAX,
};
zap_page_range(vma, start, end - start, &details);
} else
zap_page_range(vma, start, end - start, NULL);
return 0;
}

So I plan to add the Fixes to the initial git commit, 1da177e4c3f4
("Linux-2.6.12-rc2", 2005-04-16).

Does it sound right to you?

Thanks,

--
Peter Xu