Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/cpuid: Exclude unpermitted xfeatures for vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0

From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Mon Jan 24 2022 - 11:29:41 EST


On 1/24/22 17:23, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
On 24/1/2022 3:06 pm, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2022 1:50 PM

From: Like Xu <likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>

A malicious user space can bypass xstate_get_guest_group_perm() in the
KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID mechanism and obtain unpermitted xfeatures,
since the validity check of xcr0 depends only on guest_supported_xcr0.

Unpermitted xfeatures cannot pass kvm_check_cpuid()...

Indeed, 5ab2f45bba4894a0db4af8567da3efd6228dd010.

This part of logic is pretty fragile and fragmented due to semantic
inconsistencies between supported_xcr0 and guest_supported_xcr0
in other three places:

There are no inconsistencies, at least not in the examples below, as the examples
are intended to work in host context. guest_supported_xcr0 is about what the guest
is/isn't allowed to access, it has no bearing on what host userspace can/can't do.
Or are you talking about a different type of inconsistency?

The extra complication is that arch_prctl(ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM) changes what host userspace can/can't do. It would be easier if we could just say that KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID returns "the most" that userspace can do, but we already have the contract that userspace can
take KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID and pass it straight to KVM_SET_CPUID2.

Therefore, KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID must limit its returned values to what has already been enabled.

While reviewing the QEMU part of AMX support (this morning), I also noticed that there is no equivalent for guest permissions of ARCH_GET_XCOMP_SUPP. This needs to know KVM's supported_xcr0, so it's probably best realized as a new KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION rather than as an arch_prctl.

Paolo

- __do_cpuid_func

Reporting what KVM supports to host userspace.

- kvm_mpx_supported

This is a check on host support.

- kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xsave

"write" from host userspace.

Have you identified all their areas of use ?