Re: [PATCH] gvisor: add some missing definitions to vmx.h

[Sean Christopherson]

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 1/23/22 20:53, Ayush Ranjan wrote:
> > From: Michael Davidson <md@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > gvisor needs definitions for some additional secondary exec controls.
> > 
> > Tested: builds
> > Signed-off-by: Ayush Ranjan <ayushranjan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Davidson <md@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Incorrect order of the Signed-off-by header (author goes first, submitter
> goes last).
> 
> > ---
> >   arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
> > index c77ad687cdf7..df40dc568eb9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
> > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
> >   #define SECONDARY_EXEC_ENCLS_EXITING		VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(ENCLS_EXITING)
> >   #define SECONDARY_EXEC_RDSEED_EXITING		VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(RDSEED_EXITING)
> >   #define SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_PML               VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(PAGE_MOD_LOGGING)
> > +#define SECONDARY_EXEC_EPT_VE			VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(EPT_VIOLATION_VE)
> >   #define SECONDARY_EXEC_PT_CONCEAL_VMX		VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(PT_CONCEAL_VMX)
> >   #define SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES			VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(XSAVES)
> >   #define SECONDARY_EXEC_MODE_BASED_EPT_EXEC	VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(MODE_BASED_EPT_EXEC)
> 
> I'm not sure why gvisor would care about an internal Linux header. gvisor
> should only use arch/x86/include/uapi headers.

It's Google-internal kernel crud, this patch should not be merged.  Though with a
bit of patience, an equivalent patch will come with TDX support.  If we do merge
something before TDX, I'd strongly prefer to take that "complete" version with a
rewritten changelog.

[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/e519d6ae1e75a4bea494bb3940e1272e935ead18.1625186503.git.isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx