[PATCH 5.10 083/563] fs: dlm: dont call kernel_getpeername() in error_report()
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Jan 24 2022 - 14:57:14 EST
From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 4c3d90570bcc2b338f70f61f01110268e281ca3c ]
In some cases kernel_getpeername() will held the socket lock which is
already held when the socket layer calls error_report() callback. Since
commit 9dfc685e0262 ("inet: remove races in inet{6}_getname()") this
problem becomes more likely because the socket lock will be held always.
You will see something like:
bob9-u5 login: [ 562.316860] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#7, swapper/7/0
[ 562.318562] lock: 0xffff8f2284720088, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/7/0, .owner_cpu: 7
[ 562.319522] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 5.15.0+ #135
[ 562.320346] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014
[ 562.321277] Call Trace:
[ 562.321529] <IRQ>
[ 562.321734] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42
[ 562.322282] do_raw_spin_lock+0x8b/0xc0
[ 562.322674] lock_sock_nested+0x1e/0x50
[ 562.323057] inet_getname+0x39/0x110
[ 562.323425] ? sock_def_readable+0x80/0x80
[ 562.323838] lowcomms_error_report+0x63/0x260 [dlm]
[ 562.324338] ? wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout+0xd2/0x120
[ 562.324949] ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80
[ 562.325330] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0
[ 562.325735] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x40
[ 562.326218] ? del_timer+0x54/0x80
[ 562.326549] sk_error_report+0x12/0x70
[ 562.326919] tcp_validate_incoming+0x3c8/0x530
[ 562.327347] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30
[ 562.327718] ? ktime_get+0x3b/0xa0
[ 562.328055] tcp_rcv_established+0x121/0x660
[ 562.328466] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x132/0x260
[ 562.328835] tcp_v4_rcv+0xcea/0xe20
[ 562.329173] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x35/0x1f0
[ 562.329615] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x54/0x60
[ 562.330050] ip_local_deliver+0xf7/0x110
[ 562.330431] ? inet_rtm_getroute+0x211/0x840
[ 562.330848] ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1f0/0x1f0
[ 562.331310] ip_rcv+0xe1/0xf0
[ 562.331603] ? ip_local_deliver+0x110/0x110
[ 562.332011] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x46a/0x1040
[ 562.332476] ? inet_gro_receive+0x263/0x2e0
[ 562.332885] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x13b/0x2c0
[ 562.333383] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1c8/0x2f0
[ 562.333896] ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x5e0
[ 562.334285] gro_normal_list.part.149+0x19/0x40
[ 562.334722] napi_complete_done+0x67/0x160
[ 562.335134] virtnet_poll+0x2ad/0x408 [virtio_net]
[ 562.335644] __napi_poll+0x28/0x140
[ 562.336012] net_rx_action+0x23d/0x300
[ 562.336414] __do_softirq+0xf2/0x2ea
[ 562.336803] irq_exit_rcu+0xc1/0xf0
[ 562.337173] common_interrupt+0xb9/0xd0
It is and was always forbidden to call kernel_getpeername() in context
of error_report(). To get rid of the problem we access the destination
address for the peer over the socket structure. While on it we fix to
print out the destination port of the inet socket.
Fixes: 1a31833d085a ("DLM: Replace nodeid_to_addr with kernel_getpeername")
Reported-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/dlm/lowcomms.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
index 0a8645ed4b2d6..904855fa20655 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
@@ -471,8 +471,8 @@ int dlm_lowcomms_connect_node(int nodeid)
static void lowcomms_error_report(struct sock *sk)
{
struct connection *con;
- struct sockaddr_storage saddr;
void (*orig_report)(struct sock *) = NULL;
+ struct inet_sock *inet;
read_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
con = sock2con(sk);
@@ -480,33 +480,31 @@ static void lowcomms_error_report(struct sock *sk)
goto out;
orig_report = listen_sock.sk_error_report;
- if (kernel_getpeername(sk->sk_socket, (struct sockaddr *)&saddr) < 0) {
- printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR "dlm: node %d: socket error "
- "sending to node %d, port %d, "
- "sk_err=%d/%d\n", dlm_our_nodeid(),
- con->nodeid, dlm_config.ci_tcp_port,
- sk->sk_err, sk->sk_err_soft);
- } else if (saddr.ss_family == AF_INET) {
- struct sockaddr_in *sin4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)&saddr;
+ inet = inet_sk(sk);
+ switch (sk->sk_family) {
+ case AF_INET:
printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR "dlm: node %d: socket error "
- "sending to node %d at %pI4, port %d, "
+ "sending to node %d at %pI4, dport %d, "
"sk_err=%d/%d\n", dlm_our_nodeid(),
- con->nodeid, &sin4->sin_addr.s_addr,
- dlm_config.ci_tcp_port, sk->sk_err,
+ con->nodeid, &inet->inet_daddr,
+ ntohs(inet->inet_dport), sk->sk_err,
sk->sk_err_soft);
- } else {
- struct sockaddr_in6 *sin6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)&saddr;
-
+ break;
+ case AF_INET6:
printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR "dlm: node %d: socket error "
- "sending to node %d at %u.%u.%u.%u, "
- "port %d, sk_err=%d/%d\n", dlm_our_nodeid(),
- con->nodeid, sin6->sin6_addr.s6_addr32[0],
- sin6->sin6_addr.s6_addr32[1],
- sin6->sin6_addr.s6_addr32[2],
- sin6->sin6_addr.s6_addr32[3],
- dlm_config.ci_tcp_port, sk->sk_err,
+ "sending to node %d at %pI6c, "
+ "dport %d, sk_err=%d/%d\n", dlm_our_nodeid(),
+ con->nodeid, &sk->sk_v6_daddr,
+ ntohs(inet->inet_dport), sk->sk_err,
sk->sk_err_soft);
+ break;
+ default:
+ printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR "dlm: node %d: socket error "
+ "invalid socket family %d set, "
+ "sk_err=%d/%d\n", dlm_our_nodeid(),
+ sk->sk_family, sk->sk_err, sk->sk_err_soft);
+ goto out;
}
out:
read_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
--
2.34.1