[PATCH 5.10 519/563] net/smc: Fix hung_task when removing SMC-R devices

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 56d99e81ecbc997a5f984684d0eeb583992b2072 upstream.

A hung_task is observed when removing SMC-R devices. Suppose that
a link group has two active links(lnk_A, lnk_B) associated with two
different SMC-R devices(dev_A, dev_B). When dev_A is removed, the
link group will be removed from smc_lgr_list and added into
lgr_linkdown_list. lnk_A will be cleared and smcibdev(A)->lnk_cnt
will reach to zero. However, when dev_B is removed then, the link
group can't be found in smc_lgr_list and lnk_B won't be cleared,
making smcibdev->lnk_cnt never reaches zero, which causes a hung_task.

This patch fixes this issue by restoring the implementation of
smc_smcr_terminate_all() to what it was before commit 349d43127dac
("net/smc: fix kernel panic caused by race of smc_sock"). The original
implementation also satisfies the intention that make sure QP destroy
earlier than CQ destroy because we will always wait for smcibdev->lnk_cnt
reaches zero, which guarantees QP has been destroyed.

Fixes: 349d43127dac ("net/smc: fix kernel panic caused by race of smc_sock")
Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/smc/smc_core.c |   17 +----------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -1002,16 +1002,11 @@ void smc_smcd_terminate_all(struct smcd_
 /* Called when an SMCR device is removed or the smc module is unloaded.
  * If smcibdev is given, all SMCR link groups using this device are terminated.
  * If smcibdev is NULL, all SMCR link groups are terminated.
- *
- * We must wait here for QPs been destroyed before we destroy the CQs,
- * or we won't received any CQEs and cdc_pend_tx_wr cannot reach 0 thus
- * smc_sock cannot be released.
  */
 void smc_smcr_terminate_all(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev)
 {
 	struct smc_link_group *lgr, *lg;
 	LIST_HEAD(lgr_free_list);
-	LIST_HEAD(lgr_linkdown_list);
 	int i;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&smc_lgr_list.lock);
@@ -1023,7 +1018,7 @@ void smc_smcr_terminate_all(struct smc_i
 		list_for_each_entry_safe(lgr, lg, &smc_lgr_list.list, list) {
 			for (i = 0; i < SMC_LINKS_PER_LGR_MAX; i++) {
 				if (lgr->lnk[i].smcibdev == smcibdev)
-					list_move_tail(&lgr->list, &lgr_linkdown_list);
+					smcr_link_down_cond_sched(&lgr->lnk[i]);
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -1035,16 +1030,6 @@ void smc_smcr_terminate_all(struct smc_i
 		__smc_lgr_terminate(lgr, false);
 	}
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(lgr, lg, &lgr_linkdown_list, list) {
-		for (i = 0; i < SMC_LINKS_PER_LGR_MAX; i++) {
-			if (lgr->lnk[i].smcibdev == smcibdev) {
-				mutex_lock(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
-				smcr_link_down_cond(&lgr->lnk[i]);
-				mutex_unlock(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
-			}
-		}
-	}
-
 	if (smcibdev) {
 		if (atomic_read(&smcibdev->lnk_cnt))
 			wait_event(smcibdev->lnks_deleted,