Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/563] 5.10.94-rc1 review

From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Tue Jan 25 2022 - 00:36:23 EST




On 1/24/2022 3:00 PM, Daniel Díaz wrote:
Hello!

On 1/24/22 12:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.94 release.
There are 563 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:39:11 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
    https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.94-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

Regressions detected on arm, arm64, i386, x86.

This is from arm64:
  /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c: In function 'fixup_exception':
  /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/extable.c:17:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_bpf_jit' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     17 |         if (in_bpf_jit(regs))
        |             ^~~~~~~~~~
  cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
  make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:280: arch/arm64/mm/extable.o] Error 1

And from Perf on arm, arm64, i386, x86:
  libbpf.c: In function 'bpf_object__elf_collect':
  libbpf.c:2873:31: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'GElf_Shdr' {aka 'Elf64_Shdr'})
   2873 |                         if (sh->sh_type != SHT_PROGBITS)
        |                               ^~
  libbpf.c:2877:31: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'GElf_Shdr' {aka 'Elf64_Shdr'})
   2877 |                         if (sh->sh_type != SHT_PROGBITS)
        |                               ^~
  make[4]: *** [/builds/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/current/staticobjs/libbpf.o] Error 1

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

Same here.
--
Florian