Re: [PATCH V4] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Add support for winbond chip

From: Michael Walle
Date: Tue Jan 25 2022 - 10:55:19 EST


Hi,

Am 2022-01-25 16:36, schrieb Sajida Bhanu (Temp) (QUIC):
Am 2022-01-20 10:54, schrieb Shaik Sajida Bhanu:
Add support for winbond W25Q512NW-IM chip.

Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <quic_c_sbhanu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes since V1:
- Added space before name of the flash part as suggested by Doug.

Changes since V2:
- Updated chip name as w25q512nwm as suggested by Doug.

Changes since V3:
- Updated flash_info flags passing according to below patch

Thanks!

Please note, that you also have to supply a SFDP dump, see [1].

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211207140254.87681-7-tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
As suggested by Tudor Ambarus.
---
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/winbond.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/winbond.c
b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/winbond.c index 675f32c..c4be225 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/winbond.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/winbond.c
@@ -124,6 +124,10 @@ static const struct flash_info winbond_parts[] = {
{ "w25m512jv", INFO(0xef7119, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024)
NO_SFDP_FLAGS(SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ |
SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ) },
+ { "w25q512nwm", INFO(0xef8020, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024)
+ FLAGS(SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB)
+ NO_SFDP_FLAGS(SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
+ SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },

Could you try adding OTP_INFO(256, 3, 0x1000, 0x1000), this should
enable OTP support. Could you please test this using the
flash_otp_{dump,info,erase,write} tools and add that line?

I've checked ID duplications, because there is the w25qNNjw series.
There doesn't seem to exist a w25q512jw, so we are safe for now. There
is only a w25q512jv and it has the id 0xef4020.

fun fact.. the w25q512nwm describes the OTP lock bit for the first OTP
region (the one which is not documented and I've found out that its
used for storing the SFDP) as SFDP lock bit. See ch "7.1.1 Security
Register Lock Bits (LB3, LB2, LB1, SFDP Lock bit)". So we finally have
evidence :)

-michael

Hi,

Thanks for the review..

Can you please share the documentation about OTP_INFO
settings(Advantages etc..) if any.

I would like to see support for OTP right from the start, and
because you have that specific flash chip, you are in the position
to test it :)

With this line (it should already be exact that line I provided,
I checked the datasheet), you just enable access to a seperate
OTP memory inside that flash. The datasheet calls them Security
Registers, you can have a look there.

Can you please share more info on
flash_otp_{dump,info,erase,write} tools.

What do you mean? You can find these tools in the mtd-utils
package or at http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/ (couldn't check,
website seems to be down for me at least).

You should make sure to have the latest version, which has a
bugfix for the flash_otp_dump and only newer versions have the
flash_otp_erase tool.

Examples:

# flash_otp_dump -u /dev/mtd0 0
OTP user data for /dev/mtd0
0x0000: 56 01 55 53 44 30 47 30 30 30 32 00 00 00 00 00
0x0010: 00 00 a0 a5 5c 6b 62 7b ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
0x0020: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
0x0030: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
0x0040: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
[..]

# flash_otp_info -u /dev/mtd0
Number of OTP user blocks on /dev/mtd0: 3
block 0: offset = 0x0000 size = 256 bytes [locked]
block 1: offset = 0x0100 size = 256 bytes [unlocked]
block 2: offset = 0x0200 size = 256 bytes [unlocked]

# echo -n hello world | flash_otp_write -u /dev/mtd0 0x100
Writing OTP user data on /dev/mtd0 at offset 0x100
Wrote 11 bytes of OTP user data

# flash_otp_dump -u /dev/mtd0 0x100
OTP user data for /dev/mtd0
0x0100: 68 65 6c 6c 6f 20 77 6f 72 6c 64 ff ff ff ff ff
0x0110: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
0x0120: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
[..]

# flash_otp_erase -u /dev/mtd0 0x100 0x200
# flash_otp_dump -u /dev/mtd0 0x100
OTP user data for /dev/mtd0
0x0100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
0x0110: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
0x0120: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
[..]

For completeness, there is also flash_otp_lock, but that
is not reversible and you'd lock the OTP area forever.

HTH,
-michael