[PATCH] KVM: nVMX: WARN on any attempt to allocate shadow VMCS for vmcs02

[Sean Christopherson]

WARN if KVM attempts to allocate a shadow VMCS for vmcs02.  KVM emulates
VMCS shadowing but doesn't virtualize it, i.e. KVM should never allocate
a "real" shadow VMCS for L2.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index f235f77cbc03..92ee0d821a06 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -4851,18 +4851,20 @@ static struct vmcs *alloc_shadow_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs = vmx->loaded_vmcs;
 
 	/*
-	 * We should allocate a shadow vmcs for vmcs01 only when L1
-	 * executes VMXON and free it when L1 executes VMXOFF.
-	 * As it is invalid to execute VMXON twice, we shouldn't reach
-	 * here when vmcs01 already have an allocated shadow vmcs.
+	 * KVM allocates a shadow VMCS only when L1 executes VMXON and frees it
+	 * when L1 executes VMXOFF or the vCPU is forced out of nested
+	 * operation.  VMXON faults if the CPU is already post-VMXON, so it
+	 * should be impossible to already have an allocated shadow VMCS.  KVM
+	 * doesn't support virtualization of VMCS shadowing, so vmcs01 should
+	 * always be the loaded VMCS.
 	 */
-	WARN_ON(loaded_vmcs == &vmx->vmcs01 && loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
+	if (WARN_ON(loaded_vmcs != &vmx->vmcs01 || loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs))
+		return loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs;
+
+	loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs = alloc_vmcs(true);
+	if (loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs)
+		vmcs_clear(loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
 
-	if (!loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs) {
-		loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs = alloc_vmcs(true);
-		if (loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs)
-			vmcs_clear(loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
-	}
 	return loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs;
 }
 

base-commit: edb9e50dbe18394d0fc9d0494f5b6046fc912d33
-- 
2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog