Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] RISC-V: Do not use cpumask data structure for hartid bitmap

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Atish,

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 3:21 AM Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 2:26 PM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 20 Jan 2022, at 09:09, Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Currently, SBI APIs accept a hartmask that is generated from struct
> > > cpumask. Cpumask data structure can hold upto NR_CPUs value. Thus, it
> > > is not the correct data structure for hartids as it can be higher
> > > than NR_CPUs for platforms with sparse or discontguous hartids.
> > >
> > > Remove all association between hartid mask and struct cpumask.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (For Linux RISC-V changes)
> > > Acked-by: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (For KVM RISC-V changes)
> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> I am yet to reproduce it on my end.
> @Geert Uytterhoeven: can you please try the below diff on your end.

Unfortunately it doesn't fix the issue for me.

/me debugging...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds