Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/5] drm/i915: add needs_compact_pt flag

From: Thomas Hellström (Intel)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2022 - 04:38:05 EST



On 1/26/22 18:11, Robert Beckett wrote:


On 26/01/2022 13:49, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote:

On 1/25/22 20:35, Robert Beckett wrote:
From: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx>

Add a new platform flag, needs_compact_pt, to mark the requirement of
compact pt layout support for the ppGTT when using 64K GTT pages.

With this flag has_64k_pages will only indicate requirement of 64K
GTT page sizes or larger for device local memory access.

Suggested-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          | 10 +++++++---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c          |  2 ++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h |  1 +
  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 44c1f98144b4..1258b7779705 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1512,12 +1512,16 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
  /*
   * Set this flag, when platform requires 64K GTT page sizes or larger for
- * device local memory access. Also this flag implies that we require or
- * at least support the compact PT layout for the ppGTT when using the 64K
- * GTT pages.

Why do we remove these comment lines?
Because HAS_64K_PAGES now means just 64K page, it no longer means also requires compact pt.
This is to support other products that will have 64K but not have the PDE non-sharing restriction in future.

Those lines moved to the next change NEEDS_COMPACT_PT, which is now separate.

Yes, NEEDS_COMPACT_PT indicates that compact is *required* but does "HAS_64K_PAGES" still mean compact is supported? That information is lost.

/Thomas