Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_bcm2835aux: Add ACPI support

[Florian Fainelli]

On 2/1/2022 10:50 AM, Adrien Thierry wrote:
> Add ACPI support to 8250_bcm2835aux driver. This makes it possible to
> use the miniuart on the Raspberry Pi with the tianocore/edk2 UEFI
> firmware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrien Thierry <athierry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c
> index fd95860cd..b904b321e 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>    * simultaneously to rs485.
>    */
>   
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>   #include <linux/clk.h>
>   #include <linux/io.h>
>   #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -44,6 +45,10 @@ struct bcm2835aux_data {
>   	u32 cntl;
>   };
>   
> +struct bcm2835_aux_serial_acpi_driver_data {
> +	resource_size_t offset;
> +};
> +
>   static void bcm2835aux_rs485_start_tx(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>   {
>   	if (!(up->port.rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX)) {
> @@ -82,8 +87,12 @@ static int bcm2835aux_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
>   	struct uart_8250_port up = { };
>   	struct bcm2835aux_data *data;
> +	struct bcm2835_aux_serial_acpi_driver_data *acpi_data;
>   	struct resource *res;
>   	int ret;
> +	resource_size_t mapbase;
> +	resource_size_t mapsize;
> +	unsigned int uartclk;
>   
>   	/* allocate the custom structure */
>   	data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -108,10 +117,12 @@ static int bcm2835aux_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   
>   	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
>   
> -	/* get the clock - this also enables the HW */
> -	data->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> -	if (IS_ERR(data->clk))
> -		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(data->clk), "could not get clk\n");
> +	if (dev_of_node(&pdev->dev)) {
> +		/* get the clock - this also enables the HW */
> +		data->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +		if (IS_ERR(data->clk))
> +			return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(data->clk), "could not get clk\n");
> +	}

This does not seem necessary, if the clk is NULL when probed via ACPI, 
all of the clk_* APIs will deal with that gracefully. If you need not to 
treat -ENOENT as a hard error here, consider switching to 
devm_clk_get_optional(). Given that you look at the 'clock-frequency' 
property, you can still have some generic code, something like:

	if (IS_ERR(data->clk)) {
		ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "clock-frequency", &uartclk);
		if (ret)
			return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "could not get clk\n");
	}

>   
>   	/* get the interrupt */
>   	ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> @@ -125,20 +136,59 @@ static int bcm2835aux_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "memory resource not found");
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
> -	up.port.mapbase = res->start;
> -	up.port.mapsize = resource_size(res);
> -
> -	/* Check for a fixed line number */
> -	ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "serial");
> -	if (ret >= 0)
> -		up.port.line = ret;
> -
> -	/* enable the clock as a last step */
> -	ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->clk);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to enable uart clock - %d\n",
> -			ret);
> -		return ret;

All of that path can be common, and you can just define an offset to 
apply to the resource at the top after you fetched the memory resource. 
The offset will be non-0 for ACPI and 0 for non-ACPI. That is, no need 
for the intermediate variables and conditional paths whether this is 
ACPI apply this offset, or not.

> +
> +	mapbase = res->start;
> +	mapsize = resource_size(res);
> +
> +	if (has_acpi_companion(&pdev->dev)) {
> +		const struct acpi_device_id *match;
> +
> +		match = acpi_match_device(pdev->dev.driver->acpi_match_table, &pdev->dev);
> +		if (!match)
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +
> +		acpi_data = (struct bcm2835_aux_serial_acpi_driver_data *)match->driver_data;
> +
> +		/* Some UEFI implementations (e.g. tianocore/edk2 for the Raspberry Pi)
> +		 * describe the miniuart with a base address that encompasses the auxiliary
> +		 * registers shared between the miniuart and spi.
> +		 *
> +		 * This is due to historical reasons, see discussion here :
> +		 * https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/87501357#84349
> +		 *
> +		 * We need to add the offset between the miniuart and auxiliary
> +		 * registers to get the real miniuart base address.

And ACPI on the Pi4 is so widely deployed that fixing the miniuart 
resources is not an option at all? This really really continues to 
contribute to my impression that ACPI on the Pi4 is a fad more than a 
real thing, sorry.
--
Florian