Re: [PATCH v6 7/9] platform/x86: serial-multi-instantiate: Add SPI support

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 2/1/22 16:02, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 1/21/22 18:24, Stefan Binding wrote:
>> Add support for spi bus in serial-multi-instantiate driver
>>
>> Some peripherals can have either a I2C or a SPI connection
>> to the host (but not both) but use the same HID for both
>> types. So it is not possible to use the HID to determine
>> whether it is I2C or SPI. The driver must check the node
>> to see if it contains I2cSerialBus or SpiSerialBus entries.
>>
>> For backwards-compatibility with the existing nodes I2C is
>> checked first and if such entries are found ONLY I2C devices
>> are created. Since some existing nodes that were already
>> handled by this driver could also contain unrelated
>> SpiSerialBus nodes that were previously ignored, and this
>> preserves that behavior. If there is ever a need to handle
>> a node where both I2C and SPI devices must be instantiated
>> this can be added in future.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Binding <sbinding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig                  |   2 +-
>>  .../platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c   | 174 +++++++++++++++---
>>  2 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
>> index 2e656909a866..8d1eec208854 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ config TOPSTAR_LAPTOP
>>  
>>  config SERIAL_MULTI_INSTANTIATE
>>  	tristate "Serial bus multi instantiate pseudo device driver"
>> -	depends on I2C && ACPI
>> +	depends on I2C && SPI && ACPI
>>  	help
>>  	  Some ACPI-based systems list multiple devices in a single ACPI
>>  	  firmware-node. This driver will instantiate separate clients
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c b/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c
>> index 4cd6d72a0741..3f05385ca2cf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/module.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/property.h>
>> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>>  
>>  #define IRQ_RESOURCE_TYPE	GENMASK(1, 0)
>> @@ -21,15 +22,28 @@
>>  #define IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO	1
>>  #define IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC	2
>>  
>> +enum smi_bus_type {
>> +	SMI_I2C,
>> +	SMI_SPI,
>> +	SMI_AUTO_DETECT,
>> +};
>> +
>>  struct smi_instance {
>>  	const char *type;
>>  	unsigned int flags;
>>  	int irq_idx;
>>  };
>>  
>> +struct smi_node {
>> +	enum smi_bus_type bus_type;
>> +	struct smi_instance instances[];
>> +};
>> +
>>  struct smi {
>>  	int i2c_num;
>> +	int spi_num;
>>  	struct i2c_client **i2c_devs;
>> +	struct spi_device **spi_devs;
>>  };
>>  
>>  static int smi_get_irq(struct platform_device *pdev, struct acpi_device *adev,
>> @@ -59,6 +73,95 @@ static void smi_devs_unregister(struct smi *smi)
>>  {
>>  	while (smi->i2c_num > 0)
>>  		i2c_unregister_device(smi->i2c_devs[--smi->i2c_num]);
>> +
>> +	while (smi->spi_num > 0)
>> +		spi_unregister_device(smi->spi_devs[--smi->spi_num]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * smi_spi_probe - Instantiate multiple SPI devices from inst array
>> + * @pdev:	Platform device
>> + * @adev:	ACPI device
>> + * @smi:	Internal struct for Serial multi instantiate driver
>> + * @inst_array:	Array of instances to probe
>> + *
>> + * Returns the number of SPI devices instantiate, Zero if none is found or a negative error code.
>> + */
>> +static int smi_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct acpi_device *adev, struct smi *smi,
>> +			 const struct smi_instance *inst_array)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +	struct spi_controller *ctlr;
>> +	struct spi_device *spi_dev;
>> +	char name[50];
>> +	int i, ret, count;
>> +
>> +	ret = acpi_spi_count_resources(adev);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		return ret;
>> +	else if (!ret)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	count = ret;
>> +
>> +	smi->spi_devs = devm_kcalloc(dev, count, sizeof(*smi->spi_devs), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!smi->spi_devs)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < count && inst_array[i].type; i++) {
>> +
>> +		spi_dev = acpi_spi_device_alloc(NULL, adev, i);
>> +		if (IS_ERR(spi_dev)) {
>> +			ret = PTR_ERR(spi_dev);
>> +			dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to allocate SPI device %s from ACPI: %d\n",
>> +				      dev_name(&adev->dev), ret);
>> +			goto error;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		ctlr = spi_dev->controller;
>> +
>> +		strscpy(spi_dev->modalias, inst_array[i].type, sizeof(spi_dev->modalias));
>> +
>> +		ret = smi_get_irq(pdev, adev, &inst_array[i]);
>> +		if (ret < 0) {
>> +			spi_dev_put(spi_dev);
>> +			goto error;
>> +		}
>> +		spi_dev->irq = ret;
>> +
>> +		snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s-%s-%s.%d", dev_name(&ctlr->dev), dev_name(dev),
>> +			 inst_array[i].type, i);
>> +		spi_dev->dev.init_name = name;
>> +
>> +		ret = spi_add_device(spi_dev);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err_probe(&ctlr->dev, ret,
>> +				      "failed to add SPI device %s from ACPI: %d\n",
>> +				      dev_name(&adev->dev), ret);
>> +			spi_dev_put(spi_dev);
>> +			goto error;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		dev_dbg(dev, "SPI device %s using chip select %u", name, spi_dev->chip_select);
>> +
>> +		smi->spi_devs[i] = spi_dev;
>> +		smi->spi_num++;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (smi->spi_num < count) {
>> +		dev_dbg(dev, "Error finding driver, idx %d\n", i);
>> +		ret = -ENODEV;
>> +		goto error;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	dev_info(dev, "Instantiated %d SPI devices.\n", smi->spi_num);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +error:
>> +	smi_devs_unregister(smi);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +
>>  }
>>  
>>  /**
>> @@ -126,8 +229,8 @@ static int smi_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct acpi_device *adev,
>>  
>>  static int smi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>> -	const struct smi_instance *inst_array;
>>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +	const struct smi_node *node;
>>  	struct acpi_device *adev;
>>  	struct smi *smi;
>>  
>> @@ -135,8 +238,8 @@ static int smi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	if (!adev)
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>>  
>> -	inst_array = device_get_match_data(dev);
>> -	if (!inst_array) {
>> +	node = device_get_match_data(dev);
>> +	if (!node) {
>>  		dev_dbg(dev, "Error ACPI match data is missing\n");
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>>  	}
>> @@ -147,7 +250,21 @@ static int smi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  
>>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, smi);
>>  
>> -	return smi_i2c_probe(pdev, adev, smi, inst_array);
>> +	switch (node->bus_type) {
>> +	case SMI_I2C:
>> +		return smi_i2c_probe(pdev, adev, smi, node->instances);
>> +	case SMI_SPI:
>> +		return smi_spi_probe(pdev, adev, smi, node->instances);
>> +	case SMI_AUTO_DETECT:
>> +		if (i2c_acpi_client_count(adev) > 0)
>> +			return smi_i2c_probe(pdev, adev, smi, node->instances);
>> +		else
>> +			return smi_spi_probe(pdev, adev, smi, node->instances);
>> +	default:
>> +		break;
> 
> Please replace this break with : "return -EINVAL" (since we really
> should never hit this default case).
> 
> With that fixed, please add my R-b to the next version:

Note since Mark has merged 1-4 and provided a tag + pull-req for those
changes (thank you Mark). I plan to merge the rest of this series
into pdx86/for-next later today (except for 8/9).

I'll add the "return -EINVAL" myself when merging, so there is no
need to send out a new version.

Regards,

Hans




> 
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 
> 
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0; /* never reached */
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int smi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> @@ -159,27 +276,36 @@ static int smi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static const struct smi_instance bsg1160_data[]  = {
>> -	{ "bmc150_accel", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>> -	{ "bmc150_magn" },
>> -	{ "bmg160" },
>> -	{}
>> +static const struct smi_node bsg1160_data = {
>> +	.instances = {
>> +		{ "bmc150_accel", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>> +		{ "bmc150_magn" },
>> +		{ "bmg160" },
>> +		{}
>> +	},
>> +	.bus_type = SMI_I2C,
>>  };
>>  
>> -static const struct smi_instance bsg2150_data[]  = {
>> -	{ "bmc150_accel", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>> -	{ "bmc150_magn" },
>> -	/* The resources describe a 3th client, but it is not really there. */
>> -	{ "bsg2150_dummy_dev" },
>> -	{}
>> +static const struct smi_node bsg2150_data = {
>> +	.instances = {
>> +		{ "bmc150_accel", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>> +		{ "bmc150_magn" },
>> +		/* The resources describe a 3th client, but it is not really there. */
>> +		{ "bsg2150_dummy_dev" },
>> +		{}
>> +	},
>> +	.bus_type = SMI_I2C,
>>  };
>>  
>> -static const struct smi_instance int3515_data[]  = {
>> -	{ "tps6598x", IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC, 0 },
>> -	{ "tps6598x", IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC, 1 },
>> -	{ "tps6598x", IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC, 2 },
>> -	{ "tps6598x", IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC, 3 },
>> -	{}
>> +static const struct smi_node int3515_data = {
>> +	.instances = {
>> +		{ "tps6598x", IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC, 0 },
>> +		{ "tps6598x", IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC, 1 },
>> +		{ "tps6598x", IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC, 2 },
>> +		{ "tps6598x", IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC, 3 },
>> +		{}
>> +	},
>> +	.bus_type = SMI_I2C,
>>  };
>>  
>>  /*
>> @@ -187,9 +313,9 @@ static const struct smi_instance int3515_data[]  = {
>>   * drivers/acpi/scan.c: acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent().
>>   */
>>  static const struct acpi_device_id smi_acpi_ids[] = {
>> -	{ "BSG1160", (unsigned long)bsg1160_data },
>> -	{ "BSG2150", (unsigned long)bsg2150_data },
>> -	{ "INT3515", (unsigned long)int3515_data },
>> +	{ "BSG1160", (unsigned long)&bsg1160_data },
>> +	{ "BSG2150", (unsigned long)&bsg2150_data },
>> +	{ "INT3515", (unsigned long)&int3515_data },
>>  	{ }
>>  };
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, smi_acpi_ids);
>>