Re: [PATCH] hwtracing: coresight: Replace acpi_bus_get_device()

From: Suzuki K Poulose
Date: Wed Feb 02 2022 - 11:46:47 EST


On 02/02/2022 13:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 12:43 PM Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Rafael

On 01/02/2022 17:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

Replace acpi_bus_get_device() that is going to be dropped with
acpi_fetch_acpi_dev().

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>


---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static int acpi_coresight_parse_link(str
const union acpi_object *link,
struct coresight_connection *conn)
{
- int rc, dir;
+ int dir;
const union acpi_object *fields;
struct acpi_device *r_adev;
struct device *rdev;
@@ -643,9 +643,9 @@ static int acpi_coresight_parse_link(str
fields[3].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
return -EINVAL;

- rc = acpi_bus_get_device(fields[2].reference.handle, &r_adev);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
+ r_adev = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(fields[2].reference.handle);
+ if (!r_adev)
+ return -ENODEV;


Is this patch part of a series ?

No, it isn't.

I don't see acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() in v5.17-rc1, which our tree is based on at the moment.

acpi_fetch_acpi_dev() is there in v5.17-rc1. Please see

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17-rc1/A/ident/acpi_fetch_acpi_dev

Please could you point us to the changes ?

Also do you expect to pull this via your tree ?

I can route it via the ACPI tree, but it may as well be routed along
with other coresight-platform.c changes, if any.

Apologies, obviously, I was looking at the wrong tree. I will queue this

Thanks
Suzuki