On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 02:19:19PM +0100, William Roche wrote:
As we are moving the dram_type cached date from pvt to umc for family >=Who would be that comment for? People who are looking at the code, so
0x17, should we also add a small comment for the dram_type field in the
amd64_pvt structure to indicate that ?
that they know which is which?
Something like that for example:Btw, I'd appreciate it if you do not top-post.
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@
/* place to store error injection parameters prior to issue */
struct error_injection injection;
- /* cache the dram_type */
+ /* cache the dram_type for family<0x17 */
enum mem_type dram_type;
struct amd64_umc *umc; /* UMC registers */
Just a suggestion.
The code looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: William Roche <william.roche@xxxxxxxxxx>
W.
Thx.