Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Introduce deny_sysfs_ops flag
From: Puranjay Mohan
Date: Thu Feb 03 2022 - 15:10:50 EST
Hi Mathieu,
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 12:07 AM Mathieu Poirier
<mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Puranjay,
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 07:41:51PM +0530, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> > The remoteproc framework provides sysfs interfaces for changing
> > the firmware name and for starting/stopping a remote processor
> > through the sysfs files 'state' and 'firmware'. The 'recovery'
> > sysfs file can also be used similarly to control the error recovery
> > state machine of a remoteproc. These interfaces are currently
> > allowed irrespective of how the remoteprocs were booted (like
> > remoteproc self auto-boot, remoteproc client-driven boot etc).
> > These interfaces can adversely affect a remoteproc and its clients
> > especially when a remoteproc is being controlled by a remoteproc
> > client driver(s). Also, not all remoteproc drivers may want to
> > support the sysfs interfaces by default.
> >
> > Add support to deny the sysfs state/firmware/recovery change by
> > introducing a state flag 'deny_sysfs_ops' that the individual
> > remoteproc drivers can set based on their usage needs. The default
> > behavior is to allow the sysfs operations as before.
> >
> > Implement attribute_group->is_visible() to hide the sysfs
> > state/firmware/recovery entries when deny_sysfs_ops flag is set.
> >
>
> The address in the "To:" field of this email doesn't match the one in the SoB,
> Something that makes checkpatch angry.
I will try to figure this out.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <p-mohan@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
> > index ea8b89f97d7b..4a41abdd1f7b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
> > @@ -230,6 +230,21 @@ static ssize_t name_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > }
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name);
> >
> > +static umode_t rproc_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
> > + int n)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> > + struct rproc *rproc = to_rproc(dev);
> > + umode_t mode = attr->mode;
> > +
> > + if (rproc->deny_sysfs_ops && (attr == &dev_attr_recovery.attr ||
> > + attr == &dev_attr_firmware.attr ||
> > + attr == &dev_attr_state.attr))
>
> I toyed with this solution for a little while. I think the use case is valid
> but hiding the above options will also result in a system that is difficult to
> use (and debug) because they convey important information.
I feel most use cases will require it to be read-only and not hidden,
so, we can set mode = 0444 in place of mode = 0 below.
It will make these files read-only without the extra code.
Actually, the idea to implement is_visble() was given by Bjorn in a
reply to the patch in the previous series[1].
>
> I suggest introducing a new kernel configuration options to make the attributes
We want to do it dynamically and on a per driver basis, hence,
implementing is_visble() would be apt, which can be controlled by the
specific driver using the deny_sysfs_ops flag.
> of the rproc_devgroup return -EINVAL when it is set. So in remoteproc_sysfs.c
> do something like:
>
> #if CONFIG_REMOTEPROC_SYSFS_RO
> static bool option_is_read_only()
> {
> return true;
> }
> #else
> static bool option_is_read_only()
> {
> return false;
> }
> #endif
>
> [...]
>
> static ssize_t recovery_store(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> struct rproc *rproc = to_rproc(dev);
>
> if (option_is_read_only())
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (sysfs_streq(buf, "enabled")) {
> /* change the flag and begin the recovery process if needed */
> rproc->recovery_disabled = false;
> rproc_trigger_recovery(rproc);
> } else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "disabled")) {
> rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
> } else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "recover")) {
> /* begin the recovery process without changing the flag */
> rproc_trigger_recovery(rproc);
> } else {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> return count;
> }
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
> > + mode = 0;
^^ here we can put mode = 0444; for read-only.
> > +
> > + return mode;
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct attribute *rproc_attrs[] = {
> > &dev_attr_coredump.attr,
> > &dev_attr_recovery.attr,
> > @@ -240,7 +255,8 @@ static struct attribute *rproc_attrs[] = {
> > };
> >
> > static const struct attribute_group rproc_devgroup = {
> > - .attrs = rproc_attrs
> > + .attrs = rproc_attrs,
> > + .is_visible = rproc_is_visible,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct attribute_group *rproc_devgroups[] = {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > index e0600e1e5c17..3849c66ce38f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > @@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
> > * @table_sz: size of @cached_table
> > * @has_iommu: flag to indicate if remote processor is behind an MMU
> > * @auto_boot: flag to indicate if remote processor should be auto-started
> > + * @deny_sysfs_ops: flag to not permit sysfs operations on state, firmware and recovery
> > * @dump_segments: list of segments in the firmware
> > * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc
> > * @elf_class: firmware ELF class
> > @@ -562,6 +563,7 @@ struct rproc {
> > size_t table_sz;
> > bool has_iommu;
> > bool auto_boot;
> > + bool deny_sysfs_ops;
> > struct list_head dump_segments;
> > int nb_vdev;
> > u8 elf_class;
> > --
> > 2.24.3
> >
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20201121030156.22857-3-s-anna@xxxxxx/
Thanks,
Puranjay Mohan