Re: [PATCH V6 03/10] PCI/DOE: Add Data Object Exchange Aux Driver

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 11:19:45PM -0800, ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Introduced in a PCI ECN [1], DOE provides a config space based mailbox
> with standard protocol discovery.  Each mailbox is accessed through a
> DOE Extended Capability.
> 
> Define an auxiliary device driver which control DOE auxiliary devices
> registered on the auxiliary bus.
> 
> A DOE mailbox is allowed to support any number of protocols while some
> DOE protocol specifications apply additional restrictions.
> 
> The protocols supported are queried and cached.  pci_doe_supports_prot()
> can be used to determine if the DOE device supports the protocol
> specified.
> 
> A synchronous interface is provided in pci_doe_exchange_sync() to
> perform a single query / response exchange from the driver through the
> device specified.
> 
> Testing was conducted against QEMU using:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/1619454964-10190-1-git-send-email-cbrowy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> This code is based on Jonathan's V4 series here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20210524133938.2815206-1-Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx/

Details like references to previous versions can go below the "---"
so they are omitted from the merged commit.  Many/most maintainers now
include a Link: tag that facilitates tracing back from a commit to the
mailing list history.

> [1] https://members.pcisig.com/wg/PCI-SIG/document/14143
>     Data Object Exchange (DOE) - Approved 12 March 2020

Please update the "PCI ECN" text above and this citation to PCIe r6.0,
sec 6.30.  No need to reference the ECN now that it's part of the
published spec.

> +config PCI_DOE_DRIVER
> +	tristate "PCI Data Object Exchange (DOE) driver"
> +	select AUXILIARY_BUS
> +	help
> +	  Driver for DOE auxiliary devices.
> +
> +	  DOE provides a simple mailbox in PCI config space that is used by a
> +	  number of different protocols.  DOE is defined in the Data Object
> +	  Exchange ECN to the PCIe r5.0 spec.

Not sure this is relevant in Kconfig help, but if it is, update the
citation to PCIe r6.0, sec 6.30.

> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_DOE_DRIVER)	+= pci-doe.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND) += xen-pcifront.o
>  
> +pci-doe-y := doe.o

Why do we need this doe.o to pci-doe.o dance?  Why not just rename
doe.c to pci-doe.c?  It looks like that's what we do with pci-stub.c
and pci-pf-stub.c, which are also tristate.

> +++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,675 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Data Object Exchange ECN
> + * https://members.pcisig.com/wg/PCI-SIG/document/14143

Update citation.  Maybe copyright dates, too.

> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Huawei

> +/* Timeout of 1 second from 6.xx.1 (Operation), ECN - Data Object Exchange */

Update citation.

> +/**
> + * struct pci_doe - A single DOE mailbox driver
> + *
> + * @doe_dev: The DOE Auxiliary device being driven
> + * @abort_c: Completion used for initial abort handling
> + * @irq: Interrupt used for signaling DOE ready or abort
> + * @irq_name: Name used to identify the irq for a particular DOE

s/ irq / IRQ /

> +static int pci_doe_cache_protocols(struct pci_doe *doe)
> +{
> +	u8 index = 0;
> +	int num_prots;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	/* Discovery protocol must always be supported and must report itself */
> +	num_prots = 1;
> +	doe->prots = devm_kcalloc(&doe->doe_dev->adev.dev, num_prots,
> +				  sizeof(*doe->prots), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (doe->prots == NULL)

More idiomatic (and as you did below):

  if (!doe->prots)

> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	do {
> +		struct pci_doe_protocol *prot;
> +
> +		prot = &doe->prots[num_prots - 1];
> +		rc = pci_doe_discovery(doe, &index, &prot->vid, &prot->type);
> +		if (rc)
> +			return rc;
> +
> +		if (index) {
> +			struct pci_doe_protocol *prot_new;
> +
> +			num_prots++;
> +			prot_new = devm_krealloc(&doe->doe_dev->adev.dev,
> +						 doe->prots,
> +						 sizeof(*doe->prots) *
> +							num_prots,
> +						 GFP_KERNEL);
> +			if (prot_new == NULL)

Ditto.

> +				return -ENOMEM;
> +			doe->prots = prot_new;
> +		}
> +	} while (index);
> +
> +	doe->num_prots = num_prots;
> +	return 0;
> +}

> +static int pci_doe_reg_irq(struct pci_doe *doe)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = doe->doe_dev->pdev;
> +	bool poll = !pci_dev_msi_enabled(pdev);
> +	int offset = doe->doe_dev->cap_offset;
> +	int rc, irq;
> +	u32 val;
> +

  if (poll)
    return 0;

or maybe just:

  if (!pci_dev_msi_enabled(pdev))
    return 0;

No need to read PCI_DOE_CAP or indent all this code.

> +	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, offset + PCI_DOE_CAP, &val);
> +
> +	if (!poll && FIELD_GET(PCI_DOE_CAP_INT, val)) {
> +		irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, FIELD_GET(PCI_DOE_CAP_IRQ, val));
> +		if (irq < 0)
> +			return irq;
> +
> +		doe->irq_name = devm_kasprintf(&doe->doe_dev->adev.dev,
> +						GFP_KERNEL,
> +						"DOE[%s]",

Fill line.

> +						doe->doe_dev->adev.name);
> +		if (!doe->irq_name)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		rc = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, pci_doe_irq, 0,
> +				      doe->irq_name, doe);
> +		if (rc)
> +			return rc;
> +
> +		doe->irq = irq;
> +		pci_write_config_dword(pdev, offset + PCI_DOE_CTRL,
> +				       PCI_DOE_CTRL_INT_EN);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

> +static int pci_doe_probe(struct auxiliary_device *aux_dev,
> +			 const struct auxiliary_device_id *id)
> +{
> +	struct pci_doe_dev *doe_dev = container_of(aux_dev,
> +					struct pci_doe_dev,
> +					adev);

Fill line.

> +	struct pci_doe *doe;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	doe = devm_kzalloc(&aux_dev->dev, sizeof(*doe), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!doe)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	mutex_init(&doe->state_lock);
> +	init_completion(&doe->abort_c);
> +	doe->doe_dev = doe_dev;
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&doe->wq);
> +	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&doe->statemachine, doe_statemachine_work);
> +	dev_set_drvdata(&aux_dev->dev, doe);
> +
> +	rc = pci_doe_reg_irq(doe);

"request_irq" or "setup_irq" or something?  "reg" is a little
ambiguous.

> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	/* Reset the mailbox by issuing an abort */
> +	rc = pci_doe_abort(doe);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	rc = pci_doe_cache_protocols(doe);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	return 0;

Same as:

  return pci_doe_cache_protocols(doe);

> +static int __init pci_doe_init_module(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = auxiliary_driver_register(&pci_doe_auxiliary_drv);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("Failed pci_doe auxiliary_driver_register() ret=%d\n",
> +		       ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;

Same as:

  if (ret)
    pr_err(...);

  return ret;

> +++ b/include/linux/pci-doe.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Data Object Exchange was added as an ECN to the PCIe r5.0 spec.

Update citation.

> +struct pci_doe_dev {
> +	struct auxiliary_device adev;
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev;
> +	int cap_offset;

Can you name this "doe_cap", in the style of "msi_cap", "msix_cap",
etc?

Bjorn