Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: CPPC: Fix performance/frequency conversion

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 4:54 PM Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> CPUfreq governors request CPU frequencies using information
> on current CPU usage. The CPPC driver converts them to
> performance requests. Frequency targets are computed as:
>         target_freq = (util / cpu_capacity) * max_freq
> target_freq is then clamped between [policy->min, policy->max].
>
> The CPPC driver converts performance values to frequencies
> (and vice-versa) using cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz() and
> cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(). These functions both use two different
> factors depending on the range of the input value. For
> cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf():
> - (NOMINAL_PERF / NOMINAL_FREQ) or
> - (LOWEST_PERF / LOWEST_FREQ)
> and for cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz():
> - (NOMINAL_FREQ / NOMINAL_PERF) or
> - ((NOMINAL_PERF - LOWEST_FREQ) / (NOMINAL_PERF - LOWEST_PERF))
>
> This means:
> 1- the functions are not inverse for some values:
>    (perf_to_khz(khz_to_perf(x)) != x)
> 2- cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(LOWEST_PERF) can sometimes give
>    a different value from LOWEST_FREQ due to integer approximation
> 3- it is implied that performance and frequency are proportional
>    (NOMINAL_FREQ / NOMINAL_PERF) == (LOWEST_PERF / LOWEST_FREQ)
>
> This patch changes the conversion functions to an affine function.
> This fixes the 3 points above.
>
> Suggested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> index db17196266e4..5024d9af2e6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> @@ -303,52 +303,48 @@ static u64 cppc_get_dmi_max_khz(void)
>
>  /*
>   * If CPPC lowest_freq and nominal_freq registers are exposed then we can
> - * use them to convert perf to freq and vice versa
> - *
> - * If the perf/freq point lies between Nominal and Lowest, we can treat
> - * (Low perf, Low freq) and (Nom Perf, Nom freq) as 2D co-ordinates of a line
> - * and extrapolate the rest
> - * For perf/freq > Nominal, we use the ratio perf:freq at Nominal for conversion
> + * use them to convert perf to freq and vice versa. The conversion is
> + * extrapolated as an affine function passing by the 2 points:
> + *  - (Low perf, Low freq)
> + *  - (Nominal perf, Nominal perf)
>   */
>  static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data,
>                                              unsigned int perf)
>  {
>         struct cppc_perf_caps *caps = &cpu_data->perf_caps;
> +       s64 retval, offset = 0;
>         static u64 max_khz;
>         u64 mul, div;
>
>         if (caps->lowest_freq && caps->nominal_freq) {
> -               if (perf >= caps->nominal_perf) {
> -                       mul = caps->nominal_freq;
> -                       div = caps->nominal_perf;
> -               } else {
> -                       mul = caps->nominal_freq - caps->lowest_freq;
> -                       div = caps->nominal_perf - caps->lowest_perf;
> -               }
> +               mul = caps->nominal_freq - caps->lowest_freq;
> +               div = caps->nominal_perf - caps->lowest_perf;
> +               offset = caps->nominal_freq - (u64)caps->nominal_perf * mul / div;

Since mult is a u64, the other operands need not be cast to u64
explicitly AFAICS.

Moreover, it might be better to use div64_u64() instead of the plain
integer division.

>         } else {
>                 if (!max_khz)
>                         max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
>                 mul = max_khz;
>                 div = caps->highest_perf;
>         }
> -       return (u64)perf * mul / div;
> +
> +       retval = offset + (u64)perf * mul / div;
> +       if (retval >= 0)
> +               return retval;
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
>  static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data,
>                                              unsigned int freq)
>  {
>         struct cppc_perf_caps *caps = &cpu_data->perf_caps;
> +       s64 retval, offset = 0;
>         static u64 max_khz;
>         u64  mul, div;
>
>         if (caps->lowest_freq && caps->nominal_freq) {
> -               if (freq >= caps->nominal_freq) {
> -                       mul = caps->nominal_perf;
> -                       div = caps->nominal_freq;
> -               } else {
> -                       mul = caps->lowest_perf;
> -                       div = caps->lowest_freq;
> -               }
> +               mul = caps->nominal_perf - caps->lowest_perf;
> +               div = caps->nominal_freq - caps->lowest_freq;
> +               offset = caps->nominal_perf - (u64)caps->nominal_freq * mul / div;
>         } else {
>                 if (!max_khz)
>                         max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
> @@ -356,7 +352,10 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data,
>                 div = max_khz;
>         }
>
> -       return (u64)freq * mul / div;
> +       retval = offset + (u64)freq * mul / div;
> +       if (retval >= 0)
> +               return retval;
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
>  static int cppc_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> --
> 2.25.1
>