Re: [BUG] intersil: p54: possible deadlock in p54_remove_interface() and p54_stop()

From: Christian Lamparter
Date: Mon Feb 07 2022 - 16:13:14 EST


Hi,

On 07/02/2022 16:31, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
Hello,

My static analysis tool reports a possible deadlock in the p54 driver in Linux 5.16:

p54_remove_interface()
  mutex_lock(&priv->conf_mutex); --> Line 262 (Lock A)
wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&priv->beacon_comp, HZ); --> Line 271 (Wait X)

p54_stop()
  mutex_lock(&priv->conf_mutex); --> Line 208 (Lock A)
  p54p_stop() (call via priv->stop)
    p54_free_skb()
      p54_tx_qos_accounting_free()
        complete(&priv->beacon_comp); --> Line 230 (Wake X)

When p54_remove_interface() is executed, "Wait X" is performed by holding "Lock A". If p54_stop() is executed at this time, "Wake X" cannot be performed to wake up "Wait X" in p54_remove_interface(), because "Lock A" has been already hold by
p54_remove_interface(), causing a possible deadlock.

I find that "Wait X" is performed with a timeout, to relieve the possible deadlock;
but I think this timeout can cause inefficient execution.

I am not quite sure whether this possible problem is real and how to fix it if it is real.
Any feedback would be appreciated, thanks :)

This has been such a long long time ago. But I think I found
the right documentation entry for you:

<https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.16/driver-api/80211/mac80211.html> (scroll down a bit)
| remove_interface
| Notifies a driver that an interface is going down.
| >>The stop callback is called after this if it is the last interface
| and no monitor interfaces are present.<<
| (it goes on a bit. But I don't think there's anything important left)

The documentation tells you not to worry. p54_stop() and p54_remove_interface()
are being serialized by mac80211.

Cheers,
Christian