Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Wed Feb 09 2022 - 14:57:23 EST

Next message: Wang, Zhi A: "Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] i915/gvt: Introduce the mmio table to support VFIO new mdev API"
Previous message: Mathieu Desnoyers: "Re: [RFC 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1)"
In reply to: Catalin Marinas: "Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC"
Next in thread: Mark Rutland: "Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 03:35:35PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Note that PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is `def bool y`, so this will default to
> enabled.

It should probably be "def_bool y if HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE"...

Thanks.

Next message: Wang, Zhi A: "Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] i915/gvt: Introduce the mmio table to support VFIO new mdev API"
Previous message: Mathieu Desnoyers: "Re: [RFC 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1)"
In reply to: Catalin Marinas: "Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC"
Next in thread: Mark Rutland: "Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]