Re: [PATCH] spi: initialize ret variable

[郭力豪]

>Yes, that's what I'm asking.



>The original setting was ret=0; I just wanted to remove it when defining

>the ret, but it looks like it's required.

>Yes, it should return error at default



>I will submit new patch for this.




> The old behavior returned 0 and I am treating this as a regression.

The goal here isn't just to shut up warnings, it's to fix any problems
that they identify.  Unconditionally initialising return values is a
common way of fixing warnings while leaving real problems in place.


The original setting was ret=0; I just wanted to remove it when defining

the ret, but it looks like it's required.

Yes, it should return error at default



I will submit new patch for this.