Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 02:25:25AM CET, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:Yes.
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:39:54 +0200 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
Well we don't have the SFs at that stage, how can we tell which SF willOn Wed, 9 Feb 2022 10:57:21 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
use vnet and which SF will use eth ?
It's a different user. One works with the eswitch and creates the portIt is a little confusing, so I may well be misunderstanding but the
function. The other one takes the created instance and works with it.
Note that it may be on a different host.
cover letter says:
$ devlink dev param set pci/0000:08:00.0 name enable_sfs_aux_devs \
value false cmode runtime
$ devlink port add pci/0000:08:00.0 flavour pcisf pfnum 0 sfnum 11
So both of these run on the same side, no?
What I meant is make the former part of the latter:I see. So it would not be "global policy" but per-instance option during
$ devlink port add pci/0000:08:00.0 flavour pcisf pfnum 0 sfnum 11 noprobe
creation. That makes sense. I wonder if the HW is capable of such flow,
Moshe, Saeed?
Yep.
Maybe worth clarifying - pci/0000:08:00.0 is the eswitch side and
auxiliary/mlx5_core.sf.1 is the... "customer" side, correct?