Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/203] 5.16.10-rc1 review

From: Nathan Chancellor
Date: Mon Feb 14 2022 - 10:37:42 EST


On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:27:33PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 04:29:43PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 15:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.10 release.
> > > There are 203 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:24:36 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.10-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > On Linux mainline master branch with arm64 clang-nigtly build failed
> > due to following errors and warnings.
> > Now it is also noticed on stable-rc 5.15 and 5.16.
>
> Sounds like a compiler error. Do the clang developers know about this?

Yes, please see my response to Naresh in his other report for more
information:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/Ygp2wVo8JfWh5iOk@dev-arch.archlinux-ax161

Cheers,
Nathan