Re: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel, keembay: do not require pwm-cells

From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Mon Feb 14 2022 - 13:29:07 EST

Next message: Hao Luo: "Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: test for pinning for cgroup_view link"
Previous message: Geoff Levand: "Re: [PATCH] powerpc/boot: Add `otheros-too-big.bld` to .gitignore"
In reply to: Ayyathurai, Vijayakannan: "RE: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: do not require pwm-cells"
Next in thread: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel, keembay: do not require pwm-cells"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello Krzysztof,

when I read the subject line I thought the patch intention to be wrong.
Maybe make that:

dt-bindings: intel,keembay-pwm: Don't require #pwm-cells twice

?

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Next message: Hao Luo: "Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: test for pinning for cgroup_view link"
Previous message: Geoff Levand: "Re: [PATCH] powerpc/boot: Add `otheros-too-big.bld` to .gitignore"
In reply to: Ayyathurai, Vijayakannan: "RE: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: do not require pwm-cells"
Next in thread: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel, keembay: do not require pwm-cells"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]