Re: [PATCH v2 16/39] x86/bpf: Add ENDBR instructions to prologue and trampoline
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Feb 25 2022 - 06:21:12 EST
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:37:31PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:51:54PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > @@ -339,9 +350,18 @@ static int __bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip
> > u8 *prog;
> > int ret;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
> > + if (is_endbr(*(u32 *)ip))
> > + ip += 4;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > memcpy(old_insn, nop_insn, X86_PATCH_SIZE);
> > if (old_addr) {
> > prog = old_insn;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
> > + if (is_endbr(*(u32 *)old_addr))
> > + old_addr += 4;
> > +#endif
> > ret = t == BPF_MOD_CALL ?
> > emit_call(&prog, old_addr, ip) :
> > emit_jump(&prog, old_addr, ip);
> > @@ -352,6 +372,10 @@ static int __bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip
> > memcpy(new_insn, nop_insn, X86_PATCH_SIZE);
> > if (new_addr) {
> > prog = new_insn;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
> > + if (is_endbr(*(u32 *)new_addr))
> > + new_addr += 4;
> > +#endif
>
> All the above ifdef-itis should be able to be removed since is_endbr()
> returns false for !IBT.
So I've been pondering a skip_endbr() function for all these sites.
I just couldn't decide making it a 'function' and having a signature
like:
ip = skip_endbr(ip);
or making it macro magic and it reading:
skip_endbr(ip);
Which is why I've not cleaned it up yet. This being C(ish) I suppose
the former is less confusing, so let me go do that.