Re: [PATCH] sh: avoid using IRQ0 on SH3/4

[Sergey Shtylyov]

On 2/11/22 11:46 PM, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:

[...]
>>>> Using IRQ0 by the platform devices is going to be disallowed soon (see [1])
>>>> and the code supporting SH3/4 SoCs maps the IRQ #s starting at 0 -- modify
>>>> that code to start the IRQ #s from 16 instead.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/5e001ec1-d3f1-bcb8-7f30-a6301fd9930c@xxxxxx/
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> The patch is against Linus Torvalds' 'linux.git' repo.
>>>>
>>>>  arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh3/entry.S |    4 ++--
>>>>  include/linux/sh_intc.h        |    6 +++---
>>>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> Index: linux/arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh3/entry.S
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- linux.orig/arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh3/entry.S
>>>> +++ linux/arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh3/entry.S
>>>> @@ -470,9 +470,9 @@ ENTRY(handle_interrupt)
>>>>  	mov	r4, r0		! save vector->jmp table offset for later
>>>>  
>>>>  	shlr2	r4		! vector to IRQ# conversion
>>>> -	add	#-0x10, r4
>>>>  
>>>> -	cmp/pz	r4		! is it a valid IRQ?
>>>> +	mov	#0x10, r5
>>>> +	cmp/ge	r5, r4		! is it a valid IRQ?
>>>
>>>    Maybe I should've used cmp/hs... my 1st try at SH assembly! :-)
> 
>    Yeah, cmp/hs seems m ore correct as we don't subtract any more...
> 
>> I can test your revised patch next week on my SH7785LCR.
> 
>    Please do, although testing on the AP-SH4A* bords would be a bit more
> interesting, as they actually use IRQ0 for the SMSC911x chip...

   So, were you finally able to test it?

[...]

MBR, Sergey