Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Enabling change notification for network and cluster fs

From: Ralph Boehme
Date: Mon Feb 28 2022 - 00:50:40 EST

Next message: Manivannan Sadhasivam: "[PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Use blocking notifier instead of atomic"
Previous message: Manivannan Sadhasivam: "[PATCH] PCI: endpoint: Use blocking notifier instead of atomic"
In reply to: Amir Goldstein: "Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Enabling change notification for network and cluster fs"
Next in thread: Vivek Goyal: "Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Enabling change notification for network and cluster fs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Amir,

On 2/26/22 11:22, Amir Goldstein wrote:

I guess SMB protocol does not allow client B to request a NOTIFY on change
when client A has a directory lease, because requesting NOTIFY requires
getting a read file handle on the dir?

fwiw, you don't get a "W" SMB3 directory lease, so this is not a problem.

-slow

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Next message: Manivannan Sadhasivam: "[PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Use blocking notifier instead of atomic"
Previous message: Manivannan Sadhasivam: "[PATCH] PCI: endpoint: Use blocking notifier instead of atomic"
In reply to: Amir Goldstein: "Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Enabling change notification for network and cluster fs"
Next in thread: Vivek Goyal: "Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Enabling change notification for network and cluster fs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]