Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: hyper-v: XMM fast hypercalls fixes

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov
Date: Mon Feb 28 2022 - 06:10:42 EST


Siddharth Chandrasekaran <sidcha@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 02:17:04PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 2/25/22 14:13, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> > Let's say we have 1 half of XMM0 consumed. Now:
>> >
>> > i = 0;
>> > j = 1;
>> > if (1)
>> > sparse_banks[0] = sse128_lo(hc->xmm[0]);
>> >
>> > This doesn't look right as we need to get the upper half of XMM0.
>> >
>> > I guess it should be reversed,
>> >
>> > if (j % 2)
>> > sparse_banks[i] = sse128_hi(hc->xmm[j / 2]);
>> > else
>> > sparse_banks[i] = sse128_lo(hc->xmm[j / 2]);
>
> Maybe I am missing parts of this series.. I dont see this change in any
> of the 4 patches Vitaly sent. Yes, they look swapped to me too.
>

There was a conflict with a patch series from Sean:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20211207220926.718794-1-seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx/

and this is a part of the resolution:

commit c0f1eaeb9e628bf86bf50f11cb4a2b671528391e
Merge: 4dfc4ec2b7f5 47d3e5cdfe60
Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Feb 25 06:28:10 2022 -0500

Merge branch 'kvm-hv-xmm-hypercall-fixes' into HEAD

--
Vitaly