Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] hwmon (xdpe12284): Add support for xdpe11280

[Guenter Roeck]

On 3/1/22 10:01, Marcello Sylvester Bauer wrote:
> Add support for another Infineon Multi-phase controller chip. The
> xdpe11280 uses linear instead of vid data format for VOUT. Detect
> VOUT_MODE format during probing and set the xdpe122 related pointers
> in case it uses vid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>   Documentation/hwmon/xdpe12284.rst | 12 ++++++++----
>   drivers/hwmon/pmbus/xdpe12284.c   | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>   2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/xdpe12284.rst b/Documentation/hwmon/xdpe12284.rst
> index 67d1f87808e5..a224dc74ad35 100644
> --- a/Documentation/hwmon/xdpe12284.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/hwmon/xdpe12284.rst
> @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ Kernel driver xdpe122
>   
>   Supported chips:
>   
> +  * Infineon XDPE11280
> +
> +    Prefix: 'xdpe11280'
> +
>     * Infineon XDPE12254
>   
>       Prefix: 'xdpe12254'
> @@ -20,10 +24,10 @@ Authors:
>   Description
>   -----------
>   
> -This driver implements support for Infineon Multi-phase XDPE122 family
> -dual loop voltage regulators.
> -The family includes XDPE12284 and XDPE12254 devices.
> -The devices from this family complaint with:
> +This driver implements support for Infineon Multi-phase XDPE112 and XDPE122
> +family dual loop voltage regulators.
> +These families include XDPE11280, XDPE12284 and XDPE12254 devices.
> +The devices from this family compliant with:
>   
>   - Intel VR13 and VR13HC rev 1.3, IMVP8 rev 1.2 and IMPVP9 rev 1.3 DC-DC
>     converter specification.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/xdpe12284.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/xdpe12284.c
> index b07da06a40c9..3413aba9d5be 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/xdpe12284.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/xdpe12284.c
> @@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ static int xdpe122_identify(struct i2c_client *client,
>   static struct pmbus_driver_info xdpe122_info = {
>   	.pages = XDPE122_PAGE_NUM,
>   	.format[PSC_VOLTAGE_IN] = linear,
> -	.format[PSC_VOLTAGE_OUT] = vid,
>   	.format[PSC_TEMPERATURE] = linear,
>   	.format[PSC_CURRENT_IN] = linear,
>   	.format[PSC_CURRENT_OUT] = linear,
> @@ -123,23 +122,39 @@ static struct pmbus_driver_info xdpe122_info = {
>   		PMBUS_HAVE_IIN | PMBUS_HAVE_IOUT | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_IOUT |
>   		PMBUS_HAVE_TEMP | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_TEMP |
>   		PMBUS_HAVE_POUT | PMBUS_HAVE_PIN | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_INPUT,
> -	.identify = xdpe122_identify,
> -	.read_word_data = xdpe122_read_word_data,
>   };
>   
>   static int xdpe122_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>   {
>   	struct pmbus_driver_info *info;
> +	int vout_mode;
>   
>   	info = devm_kmemdup(&client->dev, &xdpe122_info, sizeof(*info),
>   			    GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!info)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
> +	vout_mode = pmbus_read_byte_data(client, 0, PMBUS_VOUT_MODE);
> +	if (vout_mode >= 0 && vout_mode != 0xff) {
> +		switch (vout_mode >> 5) {
> +		case 0:
> +			info->format[PSC_VOLTAGE_OUT] = linear;
> +			break;
> +		case 1:
> +			info->format[PSC_VOLTAGE_OUT] = vid;
> +			info->identify = xdpe122_identify;
> +			info->read_word_data = xdpe122_read_word_data;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}
> +	}

I am not entirely happy with this. Why not detect the mode (linear vs. vid)
in the identify function ?

Thanks,
Guenter

> +
>   	return pmbus_do_probe(client, info);
>   }
>   
>   static const struct i2c_device_id xdpe122_id[] = {
> +	{"xdpe11280", 0},
>   	{"xdpe12254", 0},
>   	{"xdpe12284", 0},
>   	{}
> @@ -148,6 +163,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id xdpe122_id[] = {
>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, xdpe122_id);
>   
>   static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused xdpe122_of_match[] = {
> +	{.compatible = "infineon,xdpe11280"},
>   	{.compatible = "infineon,xdpe12254"},
>   	{.compatible = "infineon,xdpe12284"},
>   	{}