Re: [PATCH v2 15/39] x86/ibt,kprobes: Fix more +0 assumptions

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 09:11:50AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

> > But if you really want/need to retain that, then yes, we need that
> > else branch unconditionally :/
> 
> Thank you,

That's what I ended up doing in the latest version; I realized that
irrespective of symbol size, it is required when symbols overlap, as per
the case mentioned by Naveen.

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220301200547.GK11184@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx