Re: [PATCH v2 15/39] x86/ibt,kprobes: Fix more +0 assumptions

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 09:29:04PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > How does this look?
> 
> I gave this a quick test on powerpc and this looks good to me.

Thanks!

> > --- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> > @@ -265,7 +265,6 @@ extern int arch_init_kprobes(void);
> >  extern void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p);
> >  extern bool arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr);
> >  extern int arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void);
> > -extern bool arch_kprobe_on_func_entry(unsigned long offset);
> 
> There is a __weak definition of this function in kernel/kprobes.c which
> should also be removed.

*poof*, gone.