Re: [PATCH v5] x86/sgx: Free backing memory after faulting the enclave page

[Dave Hansen]

On 3/1/22 17:41, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 09:54:14AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 3/1/22 04:58, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> @@ -32,14 +58,16 @@ static int __sgx_encl_eldu(struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page,
>>>  	else
>>>  		page_index = PFN_DOWN(encl->size);
>>>  
>>> +	page_pcmd_off = sgx_encl_get_backing_page_pcmd_offset(encl, page_index);
>>> +
>>>  	ret = sgx_encl_lookup_backing(encl, page_index, &b);
>>>  	if (ret)
>>>  		return ret;
>> What tree is this against?  It looks like it might be on top of
>> Kristen's overcommit series.
>>
>> It would be best if you could test this on top of tip/sgx.  Kristen
>> changed code in this area as well.
> I rebased this against latest stuff and now I did a sanity check:
> 
> $ git fetch tip
> remote: Enumerating objects: 75, done.
> remote: Counting objects: 100% (75/75), done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (12/12), done.
> remote: Total 77 (delta 65), reused 65 (delta 63), pack-reused 2
> Unpacking objects: 100% (77/77), 34.07 KiB | 157.00 KiB/s, done.
>>From git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
>    161a9a33702a..cedd3614e5d9  perf/core  -> tip/perf/core
>    6255b48aebfd..25795ef6299f  sched/core -> tip/sched/core
> 
> $ git rebase tip/x86/sgx 
> Current branch master is up to date.

Are you sure you didn't also rebase all of Kristen's work along with
your one patch?  How many patches did you rebase?

You might want to do:

	git log tip/x86/sgx..