[PATCH v4 17/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write to zap TDP MMU range

[Paolo Bonzini]

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>

Now that all callers of zap_gfn_range() hold mmu_lock for write, drop
support for zapping with mmu_lock held for read.  That all callers hold
mmu_lock for write isn't a random coincidence; now that the paths that
need to zap _everything_ have their own path, the only callers left are
those that need to zap for functional correctness.  And when zapping is
required for functional correctness, mmu_lock must be held for write,
otherwise the caller has no guarantees about the state of the TDP MMU
page tables after it has run, e.g. the SPTE(s) it zapped can be
immediately replaced by a vCPU faulting in a page.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-Id: <20220226001546.360188-17-seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 24 ++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 970376297b30..f3939ce4a115 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -844,15 +844,9 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
  * function cannot yield, it will not release the MMU lock or reschedule and
  * the caller must ensure it does not supply too large a GFN range, or the
  * operation can cause a soft lockup.
- *
- * If shared is true, this thread holds the MMU lock in read mode and must
- * account for the possibility that other threads are modifying the paging
- * structures concurrently. If shared is false, this thread should hold the
- * MMU lock in write mode.
  */
 static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
-			  gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield, bool flush,
-			  bool shared)
+			  gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield, bool flush)
 {
 	bool zap_all = (start == 0 && end >= tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host());
 	struct tdp_iter iter;
@@ -865,14 +859,13 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 
 	end = min(end, tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host());
 
-	kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(kvm, shared);
+	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	for_each_tdp_pte_min_level(iter, root, min_level, start, end) {
-retry:
 		if (can_yield &&
-		    tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, flush, shared)) {
+		    tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, flush, false)) {
 			flush = false;
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -891,12 +884,8 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 		    !is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level))
 			continue;
 
-		if (!shared) {
-			tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
-			flush = true;
-		} else if (tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter)) {
-			goto retry;
-		}
+		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
+		flush = true;
 	}
 
 	rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -915,8 +904,7 @@ bool __kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t start,
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
 
 	for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, as_id)
-		flush = zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, start, end, can_yield, flush,
-				      false);
+		flush = zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, start, end, can_yield, flush);
 
 	return flush;
 }
-- 
2.31.1