Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/8] bpf: Add kprobe multi link
From: Andrii Nakryiko
Date: Fri Mar 04 2022 - 18:11:11 EST
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 9:06 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> hi,
> this patchset adds new link type BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI that attaches
> kprobe program through fprobe API [1] instroduced by Masami.
>
> The fprobe API allows to attach probe on multiple functions at once very
> fast, because it works on top of ftrace. On the other hand this limits
> the probe point to the function entry or return.
>
>
> With bpftrace support I see following attach speed:
>
> # perf stat --null -r 5 ./src/bpftrace -e 'kprobe:x* { } i:ms:1 { exit(); } '
> Attaching 2 probes...
> Attaching 3342 functions
> ...
>
> 1.4960 +- 0.0285 seconds time elapsed ( +- 1.91% )
>
>
> v2 changes:
> - based on latest fprobe changes [1]
> - renaming the uapi interface to kprobe multi
> - adding support for sort_r to pass user pointer for swap functions
> and using that in cookie support to keep just single functions array
> - moving new link to kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c file
> - using single fprobe callback function for entry and exit
> - using kvzalloc, libbpf_ensure_mem functions
> - adding new k[ret]probe.multi sections instead of using current kprobe
> - used glob_match from test_progs.c, added '?' matching
> - move bpf_get_func_ip verifier inline change to seprate change
> - couple of other minor fixes
>
>
I think it's shaping up pretty well. Great work, Jiri! Can't wait to
adopt this in retsnoop. See below about dependency on Masami's
patches.
> Also available at:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git
> bpf/kprobe_multi
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/164458044634.586276.3261555265565111183.stgit@devnote2/
Masami, Jiri, Steven, what would be the logistics here? What's the
plan for getting this upstream? Any idea about timelines? I really
hope it won't take as long as it took for kretprobe stack trace
capturing fixes last year to land. Can we take Masami's changes
through bpf-next tree? If yes, Steven, can you please review and give
your acks? Thanks for understanding!
> ---
> Jiri Olsa (10):
> lib/sort: Add priv pointer to swap function
> bpf: Add multi kprobe link
> bpf: Add bpf_get_func_ip kprobe helper for multi kprobe link
> bpf: Add support to inline bpf_get_func_ip helper on x86
> bpf: Add cookie support to programs attached with kprobe multi link
> libbpf: Add libbpf_kallsyms_parse function
> libbpf: Add bpf_link_create support for multi kprobes
> libbpf: Add bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts support for multi kprobes
> selftest/bpf: Add kprobe_multi attach test
> selftest/bpf: Add kprobe_multi test for bpf_cookie values
>
> include/linux/bpf_types.h | 1 +
> include/linux/sort.h | 4 +-
> include/linux/trace_events.h | 6 ++
> include/linux/types.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 ++++
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 26 ++++++--
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 21 +++++-
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 331 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> lib/sort.c | 42 +++++++++---
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 ++++
> tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 7 ++
> tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 9 ++-
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 192 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 5 ++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_bpf_cookie.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++
> 18 files changed, 930 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_bpf_cookie.c