Re: [PATCH] x86/bug: __WARN_FLAGS: prevent shadowing by renaming local variable f to __flags
From: Vincent MAILHOL
Date: Fri Mar 04 2022 - 23:00:19 EST
On Tue. 5 Mar 2022 à 04:26, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:08 AM Vincent Mailhol
> <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The macro __WARN_FLAGS() uses a local variable named "f". This being a
> > common name, there is a risk of shadowing other variables.
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > | In file included from ./include/linux/bug.h:5,
> > | from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:14,
> > | from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:5,
> > | from ./arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:11,
> > | from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:22,
> > | from ./arch/x86/include/asm/timex.h:5,
> > | from ./include/linux/timex.h:65,
> > | from ./include/linux/time32.h:13,
> > | from ./include/linux/time.h:60,
> > | from ./include/linux/stat.h:19,
> > | from ./include/linux/module.h:13,
> > | from virt/lib/irqbypass.mod.c:1:
> > | ./include/linux/rcupdate.h: In function 'rcu_head_after_call_rcu':
> > | ./arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:80:21: warning: declaration of 'f' shadows a parameter [-Wshadow]
> > | 80 | __auto_type f = BUGFLAG_WARNING|(flags); \
> > | | ^
> > | ./include/asm-generic/bug.h:106:17: note: in expansion of macro '__WARN_FLAGS'
> > | 106 | __WARN_FLAGS(BUGFLAG_ONCE | \
> > | | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:1007:9: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN_ON_ONCE'
> > | 1007 | WARN_ON_ONCE(func != (rcu_callback_t)~0L);
> > | | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | In file included from ./include/linux/rbtree.h:24,
> > | from ./include/linux/mm_types.h:11,
> > | from ./include/linux/buildid.h:5,
> > | from ./include/linux/module.h:14,
> > | from virt/lib/irqbypass.mod.c:1:
> > | ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:1001:62: note: shadowed declaration is here
> > | 1001 | rcu_head_after_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t f)
> > | | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
> >
> > This patch renames the variable from f to __flags (with two underscore
> > prefixes as suggested in the Linux kernel coding style [1]) in order
> > to prevent collisions.
> >
> > [1] Linux kernel coding style, section 12) Macros, Enums and RTL,
> > paragraph 5) namespace collisions when defining local variables in
> > macros resembling functions
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/coding-style.html#macros-enums-and-rtl
Indeed! Will update this in v2 (and will also fix the Fixes: tag as
pointed by Josh).
> Ah, thanks for the patch. I missed that coding style recommendation.
> Might want to link to a newer (or evergreen) version of the docs
> though:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#macros-enums-and-rtl
> Not sure what happens when we start shadowing variables named __flags,
> but maybe we cross that bridge if/when we get there.
Ack.
> Thanks for the fix!
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>