Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] misc: Add power-efuse driver

From: Zev Weiss
Date: Tue Mar 08 2022 - 03:23:47 EST


On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:07:57PM PST, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 05:18:10PM -0800, Zev Weiss wrote:
+static DEVICE_ATTR(operstate, 0644, efuse_show_operstate, efuse_set_operstate);

DEVICE_ATTR_RW()?


Ack.

+
+#define EFUSE_ERROR_ATTR(name, bit) \
+ static ssize_t efuse_show_##name(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, \
+ char *buf) \
+ { \
+ struct efuse *efuse = dev_get_drvdata(dev); \
+ int status = efuse_update_error_flags(efuse); \
+ if (status) \
+ return status; \
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", !!(efuse->error_flags.cache & bit)); \
+ } \
+ static DEVICE_ATTR(name, 0444, efuse_show_##name, NULL)

DEVICE_ATTR_RO()?


Ack.

+EFUSE_ERROR_ATTR(under_voltage, REGULATOR_ERROR_UNDER_VOLTAGE);
+EFUSE_ERROR_ATTR(over_current, REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_CURRENT);
+EFUSE_ERROR_ATTR(regulation_out, REGULATOR_ERROR_REGULATION_OUT);
+EFUSE_ERROR_ATTR(fail, REGULATOR_ERROR_FAIL);
+EFUSE_ERROR_ATTR(over_temp, REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP);
+EFUSE_ERROR_ATTR(under_voltage_warn, REGULATOR_ERROR_UNDER_VOLTAGE_WARN);
+EFUSE_ERROR_ATTR(over_current_warn, REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_CURRENT_WARN);
+EFUSE_ERROR_ATTR(over_voltage_warn, REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_VOLTAGE_WARN);
+EFUSE_ERROR_ATTR(over_temp_warn, REGULATOR_ERROR_OVER_TEMP_WARN);
+
+static struct attribute *efuse_attrs[] = {
+ &dev_attr_operstate.attr,
+ &dev_attr_under_voltage.attr,
+ &dev_attr_over_current.attr,
+ &dev_attr_regulation_out.attr,
+ &dev_attr_fail.attr,
+ &dev_attr_over_temp.attr,
+ &dev_attr_under_voltage_warn.attr,
+ &dev_attr_over_current_warn.attr,
+ &dev_attr_over_voltage_warn.attr,
+ &dev_attr_over_temp_warn.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(efuse);

Shouldn't these all just be what all regulator drivers report? Or power
drivers? I find it odd that this would be the first driver that would
need to export these types of attributes. Surely there's already a
class for this?


The attributes available from the underlying regulator device don't include the error flags, and while they do include its state ('operstate' here), it's a read-only attribute, and from previous discussions with Mark I gathered that was unlikely to change (whereas it being read-write is a critical part of this driver's functionality).

Given his input on the first stab at this I took a while back, I've been hoping to hear from Mark as to whether this looked more like something he'd find palatable; perhaps he could chime in on this too? (And/or on the regulator API question in the cover letter.)


Thanks,
Zev